Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

AdamKB @ AOL.COM - Weblog

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Journals update o
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
Virginia Retiree  >
Tuesday, May 4, 2004
April 2004
Tip: AOL's BCC Explained
Journals update officially announced
Article: Companies Launch War Over Web Messaging
Journals and AOL's Money Coach
AOL AMBER Alerts
AOL's portal plans
AOL officially launches Open Mail Access
Slashdot on Open Mail Access
AOL Journals, Editors Picks, and Community Standards
AOL to announce Open Mail Access on Thursday
ICQ 4.0 Released
Article: AOL plans to revitalize Netscape?
AOL for Broadband hosts 'Smallville' spinoff
AOL ties in 'WeatherBug' with AIM
Article: Netscape Tests 'Desktop Navigator' Beta
Article: Lawmaker to AOL: You've got mail
AOL to open ICQ APIs?
Seeking Mac CS2K help with SMTP
Web Site Version 5.0 unveiled
AOL's IMAP & SMTP (not) in the news
AOL IMAP server supports SSL
Warner incorporates AIM in Matrix MMORPG
Robert Seidman responds
Latest Feedback
Reminiscing about Seidman's Online Insider
Last chance to win a Spammer's Porsche
AOLTW Execs Bow Out
Problems with AOL's SMTP Authentication (and Mail.app) - UPDATED
Article: AOL to offer content to non-subscribers
AOL's new Small Business Reality Series
New version of AOL Journals
Major/Minor Update to Unofficial AOL Email FAQ
AOL opens IMAP/SMTP servers for US membership
AOL to release new Netscape version?
« April 2004 Archive
Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Tip: AOL's BCC Explained


I'm not sure that this is asked often enough to really be a FAQ, so I'll answer it here.

Every now and than, an AOL member asks about why the AOL BCC function isn't working. BCC -- or Blind Carbon Copy -- is the method by which you send a copy of an email to a person without any of the other recipients knowing. Sometimes this is used surreptitiously, sometimes just to avoid giant public distribution lists that are better kept private. In fact, just about any time you send an email to a large group of people, it's a good idea to use BCC.

AOL's handling of BCC is especially smart (mainly when dealing with AOL recipients, of course). And it's so subtle.

The reason you might think BCC isn't working is because AOL is smart enough to know that you have the "rights" to see all the recipients of your message. So when you look at a message in your Sent folder, or if you include yourself as one of the message's recipients (either TO, CC, or BCC) -- you'll still see the whole list of recipients. Don't worry, everyone else won't see them. You can test this by sending your message to another Screen Name on your account.

You'll also see the whole list if one of your recipients forwards your message back to you.

Here's the really freaky thing. Let's say Person A sends an email BCCed to Person B and Person C. Person B forwards that message to Person C. Person C will see their own Screen Name in the original BCC field -- because they received that original message! Pretty cool, eh?

Note that none of this works the same way with third-party email clients. Some email programs keep track of the BCC recipients you send (you usually have to open up the message in its own window rather than the Preview Pane), but you won't get the more intelligent information from the server.

So relax, BCC works just fine. It's just a little smarter than we give it credit for!

For more information about sending BCCs using AOL, see AOL Help article "Sending Blind Copies."



adamkb at 2:49:00 PM EDT Blog about this entry
This entry has 2 comments: (Add your own)
  • #2 Comment from ephrh 
    10/6/07 8:50 AM Permalink
    Adam,

    Brilliant, I just received a my own email forwarded back to me as you describe and was horrified to see all the BCC addresses printed out in the forwarded copy.

    Thanks for putting my mind at rest.

    Peter.
  • #1 Comment from gww1210 
    11/24/04 8:40 PM Permalink
    Adam: With respect to your cool analysis of the Bcc - I suspected AOL was smart, and kept it secret - but I was freaked out when I got an email back, and saw private info in it --your analysis seems correct according to my own investigation -one friend reported to me that the private information stayed just that way -private.

    Thank you for your analysis --I only hope that my own web sites and varied pages are as cool or helpful and healthy.

    gordon in lakeland

    Gordon Wayne Watts http://GordonWatts.com
    BS, The Florida State University, Biological and Chemical Sciences
    AS, United Electronics Institute
    http://HomeTown.AOL.com/Gww1210 or http://www.GeoCities.com/Gordon_Watts32313
    Gww1210@aol.com ; Gww12102002@Yahoo.com
    Truth is the strongest, most stable force in the Universe.
    TRUTH doesn't bend to the will of tyrants.
    Get Truth.

    "First, they [Nazis] came for the Jews. I was silent. I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists. I was silent. I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists. I was silent. I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me. There was no one left to speak for me." (Martin Niemoller, given credit for a quotation in The Harper Religious and Inspirational Quotation Companion, ed. Margaret Pepper (New York: Harper &Row, 1989), 429 -as cited on page 44, note 17, of Religious Cleansing in the American Republic, by Keith A. Fornier, Copyright 1993, by Liberty, Life, and Family Publications.

    (Actually, they may not have come for the Jews first, as it's far more likely they came for the prisoners, mentally handicapped, and other so-called "inferiors" first -as historians tell us -so they could get "practiced up;" But, they did come for them -due to the silence of their neighbors -and due, in part, to their own silence. So the general idea is correct: "Speak up now, or forever hold your peace." --Gordon)
    *
    *