Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Old Hickory's Weblog

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< The 2006 Republic
Sunday, July 2, 2006
Iran War:  I >
Wednesday, July 5, 2006
July 2006
Iraq War: After Operation Lightning
The bombing halt
Iraq War: Al Gore on the war
A Southern Baptist cricitizes Condi-Condi
Iran and Hizbullah
Another strange George Bush press conference
Trying to follow the Israel-Lebanon War
James Bamford on the Iran hawks
Various articles on the Middle East situation
How Lebanon's Siniora sought Britain's help in May 2006 to disarm Hizbullah
And you thought the Cheney administration was reckless in *Iraq* ...
Joschka Fischer on the Israel-Lebanon War, and SPIEGEL mimics some bad habit of the US "press corps"
Israeli attacks on the UN
Questions about the Israeli Defense Force
Israel-Lebanon War: A legend failing?
Gary Hart on Bush-league diplomacy in the Middle East
More articles on the Israel-Lebanon War
Various articles on the Israel-Lebanon War
Skepticism - in both the hard and soft sciences
Israel-Lebanon War: Five Questions
Iraq War: Grim prospects
Israel's dilemma: the air war can't destroy Hizbollah, a land war has major risks
Iraq War: An evaluation by a "stay the course" supporter
An emerging "elite" consensus on Iran and Hizbollah's recent actions?
Air power
William Lind on the Israeli-Lebanese war
A short self-promotion item
Sometimes a sweater is just a sweater
Israeli preparedness
Goals of the Israeli-Lebanese war
Idolatry
Old Right isolationism and the Israeli-Lebanese war
India, Pakistan and the 07/11 attack in Mumbai
Some background on the Israeli-Lebanese war
Middle East: Death machines are rumbling...
Stabs in the back, from Yalta to Baghdad
The problems of tolerance (6): The need for tolerance, its limits and its "repressive" form
The problems of tolerance (5): Herbert Marcuse on repressive tolerance
Israel, the US and the current crisis
Syria's strategy
Against the "toy soldier model" of the Civil War
The problems of tolerance (4): Tolerance, social analysis and radical democracy
Natalie Maines (of the Dixie Chicks)
American authoritarianism
This ain't good, either
Torture in the Bush Gulag:  Is it really ending?
Iraq War: This ain't good
The problems of tolerance (3): Barrington Moore, Jr., on science and tolerance
A prophetess among us
The problems of tolerance (2): Robert Paul Wolff on going "Beyond Tolerance"
Global warming according to Tom Brokaw - and, believe it or not, it's good!
The problems of tolerance (1): Are there problems with tolerance?
What Second World War analogies would the neocons use to justify this?
Iraq War: War crimes
Frenzy on the Right
Maverick McCain gets some flack from the right
Chuckie Watch 119: Chuckie gits worked up
Andrew Jackson blasphemed (in an otherwise good post)
John Tierney and the Confederacy
Iraq War: Victory after victory after victory...
Iran War:  Is Israel shifting its position on war with Iran?
Bush and the Plame leak
The 2006 Republican campaign:  terror, terror, terror
Bob McElvaine on why Mad Annie Coulter hates Jesus and opposes Christianity
« July 2006 Archive
Tuesday, July 4, 2006
11:12:00 PM EDT
Hearing Magpie, "Old John Brown"

Bush and the Plame leak


Murray Waas has new information on the Plame leak investigation:  Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic National Journal 07/03/06.  According to Waas' report, Bush told the federal prosecutors that he had directed Dick Cheney to head up the effort to discredit Joseph Wilson, which eventually led to the outing of Plame as an undercover CIA operative.

This is not a "smoking gun" tying Bush directly to illegal actions.  But it emphasizes yet again that he was dissembling when he was answering questions in public on the leak investigation when it first got underway.  Waas writes:

One senior government official familiar with the discussions between Bush and Cheney - but who does not have firsthand knowledge of Bush's interview with prosecutors - said that Bush told the vice president to "Get it out," or "Let's get this out," regarding information that administration officials believed would rebut Wilson's allegations and would discredit him.

A person with direct knowledge of Bush's interview refused to confirm that Bush used those words, but said that the first official's account was generally consistent with what Bush had told Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald.

Libby, in language strikingly similar to Bush's words, testified to the federal grand jury in the leak case that Cheney had told him to "get all the facts out" that would defend the administration and discredit Wilson. Portions of Libby's grand jury testimony were an exhibit in a recent court filing by Fitzgerald.

But let's assume for a moment that Bush didn't intend for any illegal actions to be taken in pursuit of this goal.  We shouldn't lose sight of the war issue here.  Murray writes:

President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president's statement.

Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said.

Joe Wilson had reported his findings on the reports suggesting that Iraq had sought yellowcake uranium in Niger.  Obviously, Bush would want to "defend his administration".  But according to this, he wanted to "not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson".

But Wilson's report came to the correct conclusion.  Wilson provided more truthful information in his report than Ahmad Chalabi and his fellow scammers were manufacturing and feeding to the bureaucratic lie factories that Rummy and Cheney had set up in their respective offices.  It shows, at the very best, how very little Bush cared about whether he had taken the country to war based on fraudulent information.

Waas also reminds us of this:

A senior government official who has spoken to the president about the matter said that although Bush encouraged Cheney to get information out to rebut Wilson's charges, Bush was unaware that Cheney had directed Libby to leak classified information. The White House has pointed out that the president and vice president have broad executive powers to declassify whatever information they believe to be in the public interest. Meanwhile, court papers filed by Fitzgerald in April suggest that Libby was reluctant to leak any classified information to the press, and only did so after being assured that his actions were approved by both the president and vice president.

Regarding a meeting with Judith Miller that was scheduled for July 8, 2003, in which Cheney wanted Libby to leak her portions of the National Intelligence Estimate, Fitzgerald asserted in the court papers that Libby "testified that he was specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose... [portions] of the classified NIE to Miller on that occasion."

"[Libby] further testified that he at first advised the Vice President that he could not have this conversation with reporter Miller because of the classified nature of the NIE. [Libby] testified that the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized [Libby] to disclose the relevant portions of the NIE."

Christy Hardin Smith of FireDogLake has commented on the new Waas article: Well, Lookee Here… 07/04/06.  She writes on the timing of events discussed in Waas' article:

Coincidence? I think not. And if you think that this group of Machiavellian back-alley revenge masters would stick firmly to the "rebuttal on the facts" when they held a trump card of not only attempting to shut Ambassador Wilson up, but intimidating other critics who might also step forward, you can think again. Family has always - ALWAYS - been off limits, especially family that happens to be working for the CIA in a sensitive nuclear and other WMDs arena which is vital to national security interests for the nation at the moment.

But in this case, none of that mattered because Dick Cheney’s credibility had been questioned, the old bull saw red, and all bets were off. That sonofabitch Wilson was going to pay. (Can’t you just hear it coming out of old Mr. GFY’s mouth?)

Emptywheel at The Next Hurrah is also scrutinizing the new Waas report.  In Protecting Dick and Bush? 07/03/06, he writes:

All of which suggests that the underlying story of this Waas pieces is that Libby has claimed Bush was involved in authorizing his activities from that week. And Bush has denied part of Libby's claim.

Which all of a sudden puts some distance between OVP and WH on the Plame Affair. Dick, Addington, and Libby carried out their little insta-declassification. While WH carried out a smear the old-fashioned way, by really declassifying something first, then leaking it. (It's unclear whether the distance is real, or whether it's a nice fiction invented by all involved to protect the President.)

Now, as I suggested above, I'm not sure I buy it, mostly because I find it hard to believe that WH didn't know that Libby and Dick (and Bolton and Feith and so on and so on) had long insta-declassified things and laundered it through Judy or some other credulous reporter. That is, leaking something classified to journalists was a regular habit of the Neocon cabal's, and I really doubt that Bush knew nothing about it.



Written by bmiller224 Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)