Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

The Other Shoe

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Of Atrocities and
Monday, May 10, 2004
Interesting Idea. >
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
May 2004
Memorial Day 2004
Freedom Rock
The Former Veep...Whatta Creep!
The Enterprise Finale
Less is Moore
Curse Those Verdammten Engländer!
For the First Time in Seven Years...
Why Rock the Vote When You Can Blast It?
We'll Always Have Paris...I Guess
Is It Just Me...
If It's May...
From Our Worldly Friends at Le Monde
The Cannes Artist
Yeagh? Noooo!
A Candle to Light the Darkness
The Next Generation of Outsourcing?!?!?!?!?!?
Madness
Teachers Suspended for Showing Nick Berg Video in Class
I Am Not Edward Weston Either
Who Says the King is Dead?
This Day in History: May 19, 1935
How Could I Not Know This?
I Don't Much Agree with Her Dad's Politics...
Nick Berg and Abu al-Zarqawi
For Mature Audiences Only!
This Day in History: May 17, 1954
The Great Gasoline Boycott of 2004
The Art of War
America at War
If You Think This Blog is Dull...
Resistance is...er...Unlikely
This Day in History: May 13, 1981
The Power Outage Blues
Jenna Takes the Acacia Challenge
As I Was Saying...
Izvestia Isn't the News, and Pravda Still Isn't the Truth
The (Not Quite a) Million Mom March
Why We Fight:The Murder of Nick Berg
Interesting Idea...
Mark Steyn on John Kerry
Of Atrocities and Atrocious Behavior
The Return of Rachel Lucas
Not Just for Kids Anymore
States' Rights Indeed...One States' Right in Particular, More Like
This Day in History: May 8, 1945
¡Ouch!
This (Yester)Day in History: May 6, 1937
Occupational Hazard: One More Time
Criminal Masterminds at Work
The T-Shirt That Says It All
Art is on the Bod of the Beholder
This Day in History: May 4, 1970
Tomorrow's Bombshell News Today
More Heroic Resistance from the Palestininans
Did Someone Say "Naked Klingon Women"?
From Our "Friends" in the Region, Terrorism Explained
Happy May Day, Gospodin!
Occupational Hazard: Third in a Continuing Series
« May 2004 Archive
Tuesday, May 11, 2004

Mark Steyn on John Kerry


It looks like Mark Steyn doesn't think much of our hero:

John Kerry said something amazing the other day. He was talking to the Wall Street Journal and was asked about his many attacks on ''Benedict Arnold CEOs'' -- for example: ''We will repeal every single benefit, every single loophole, every single reward for any Benedict Arnold CEO or corporation that take American jobs overseas and stick you with the bill.'' (Kerry in Virginia, Feb. 10)

Senator Flippy has now decided this line is nonoperative. As he told the chaps at the Journal, ''You know, I called a couple of times to overzealous speechwriters and said 'Look, that's not what I'm saying.' Benedict Arnold does not refer to somebody who in the normal course of business is going to go overseas and take jobs overseas. That happens. I support that. I understand that. I was referring to the people who take advantage of noneconomic transactions purely for tax purposes -- sham transactions -- and give up American citizenship. That's a Benedict Arnold. You give up your American citizenship but you want to continue to do business.''

Got that? When Kerry talks about ''any Benedict Arnold CEO or corporation that takes American jobs overseas,'' he's not referring to someone who ''takes jobs overseas.'' Perish the thought! He's all in favor of taking jobs overseas. It wasn't him who attacked all those ''Benedict Arnold CEOs,'' just his ''overzealous speechwriters.'' And the minute he discovered it was going on, he called them to say, ''Look, that's not what I'm saying.''

I mean, OK, it was what he was saying in the narrow technical sense of words emerging from between his lips, day after day, night after night, all through primary season. I had a quick rummage through the Nexis database, and found a mere 746 citations for Kerry and the expression ''Benedict Arnold.'' I myself have personally been present on three occasions when he attacked ''Benedict Arnold CEOs'' who ''take jobs overseas,'' and on two of them he didn't have a TelePrompTer or even a script. He just stood in front of us and the words came out of his mouth, almost as if they were what he himself believed.

Kerry sure is developing a reputation for trying to have it both ways, at least until a third way comes up and then...what's the French term for menage a trois?

When John Kerry the war hero became John Kerry the most famous anti-war protester in the world for 15 minutes back in 1971, it was only the begininng of John Kerry's public life as a work in progress.

Democratic operatives have long dismissed the moron Bush as incapable of stringing two words together without puppetmaster Dick Cheney shoving his arm up the back of the coat. By announcing that he too is merely a brainless stooge reading out whatever's put in front of him, the senator could seriously cut into Bush's base in key swing states. It takes a smart guy like Kerry to position himself as such a dummy. Unless, of course, it's the new speechwriters who did it for him.

Maybe that's why he (and they) did it again. Lawrence Kaplan reports in the New Republic about a meeting the senator had with Jewish leaders to assuage their concerns about his offer to dispatch Jimmy Carter or James Baker (both regarded as pro-Arab) to the Middle East. ''One of the first things Kerry did at the meeting was to blame his aides for the mention of Carter and Baker as possible envoys in his December speech,'' writes Kaplan. ''The names, Kerry said, had been inserted by mistake, and he had even asked that they be removed.''

But apparently his request to the overzealous speechwriters to remove the names was turned down. So Kerry dutifully went ahead and read out the speech complete with the mistakenly inserted names. ''There are a number of uniquely qualified Americans among whom I would consider appointing, including President Carter, former Secretary of State James Baker or, as I suggested almost two years ago, President Clinton,'' he told the bigwigs at the Council on Foreign Relations. ''And I might add, I have had conversations with both President Clinton and President Carter about their willingness to do this.'' So not only did he read out the mistakenly inserted names he'd asked to be removed from the speech but he even went ahead and met with one of the mistakes about offering him a key role he didn't want him to have.

Why would he do this? The New Republic obtained this explanation from the campaign: ''The candidate eventually did speak with Carter -- but only after noticing that a draft of his speech said that he spoke with Carter.''

Ho!



ceklundesq at 12:14:00 AM CDT Blog about this entry
This entry has 1 comments: (Add your own)
  • #1 Comment from mawkalice 
    6/3/04 7:40 PM Permalink
    Mark Steyn points out some of John Kerry's obvious attempts to disprove some of the many things he himself says in public. The one area he seems unwlling to repent for, is his desertion from Vietnam and then from the Navy on the basis of his self-inflicted scratch on the arm to get his third purple heart. He has still not admitted that he camapigned against his fellow Swift Boat officers and men both in public speeches and in his book and in testimony before Congress.
       Senator Kerry sickens all veterans with his parading now as a Vietnam hero, despite the fact that he joined Jane Fonda and Madam Binh in campaigning against the U.S. effort to save South Vietnam from its communist conquerors from China and North Vietnam.
       When Kerry publicly repents for calling his fellow officers and men, and all Vietnam veterans "viscious murderers and war criminals", maybe God can forgive him. It will be harder for the veterans of all ages to forgive him.                      
                     Mordecai Arnold
                     Major USMC (Retd)
                     Service: 1943-1977