Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Chemical Emergenc
Saturday, April 5, 2008
Federal Preemptio >
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
April 2008
DHS Announces formation of Critical Manufacturing Sector
Reader Comments 4-28-08
Emergency Response Exercise – Hamilton County, TN
Inherently Safer Technology Assessment under HR 5577
One University’s Response to CFATS
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 4-25-08
International Hazardous Materials Response Teams Conference
Third Party Entities under HR 5577
Cybersecurity Bypassed Through Backdoor?
Regulate the Sale of Ammonium Nitrate
Anhydrous Ammonia Incident
Terrorist Attack as a Crime Scene
Weather Service HAZMAT Page
Reply – Blog Comment 4-21-08
DHS FAQ Web Page Update – 4-22-08
A Response to Complaints about CFATS
Terrorist CBRN Hazards
Another comment related to Railroad Hazmat Route Selection Rule
Chemical Incident Review – 4-21-08
Blog Comment – Railroad Hazmat Route Selection Rule
CSB Report on Hazardous Waste Site Fire and Explosions
CSAT Pages Back Up
Appeal Procedures for Route Security Finding
Railroad Hazmat Route Selection Rule
House Homeland Security Hearing on TSA
Two New Railroad Hazmat Security Rules
Turnaround Security Issues
Update on Green Scorpion Exercise
Public Meetings about Proposed PIH Railcar Regulations
HR5577 Update 04-14-08
Protected Information under HR 5577
2008 Chemical Security Summit Update 04-12-08
HR2419 Update 04-11-08
Cyber Storm II – Communications Lessons
Emergency Alert Systems
New Online Tools Available for Facilities with Fuels or Flammable COI
CSAT Outage Week of 3-14-08
Federal Preemption Rules under HR 5577
Penalties allowed under HR 5577
Chemical Emergency Exercise to take Place at Expo
DHS Increases Usability of FAQ Page
Whistleblower Provisions of HR 5577
EPA Report Includes Water Plant Chemical Security Data
Response to Comment on 4-1-08 Blog
DOT Proposed Rule Touches on IST
Proposed Rail Rule Will Increase Pressure for IST
« April 2008 Archive
Monday, April 7, 2008
Subject: Penalties allowed under HR 5577
Time: 2:47:00 PM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



This is part of a continuing series taking a detailed look at the provisions of the new Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 recently introduced in Congress (HR 5577IH). Today’s entry looks at Section 2106 that deals with penalties authorized for use in the enforcement of CFATA of 2008.

 

Previous blogs in this series include:

 

·        CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577

·        Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577

·        Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577

·        General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577

·        Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577

·        Minimum SSP Requirements under HR 5577

·        Risk Based Performance Standards under HR 5577

·        Alternative Security Programs under HR 5577

·        Record Keeping and Site Inspections under HR 5577

·        DHS Review of SVA’s and SSP’s under HR 5577

·        Whistleblower Provisions of HR 5577

 

In an earlier blog we looked at the Secretary’s responsibility to review the submitted SVA’s and SSP’s to ensure that they meet the minimum requirements of the proposed legislation. Ultimately the Secretary has the authority to shut down non-complying facility. In this blog we will look at the enforcement tools that the Secretary has between those two stages.

 

Civil Penalties

 

The Secretary is authorized to bring action in US district court to enforce the provisions of this legislation. Specifically actions may be brought against facilities that fail to comply with orders issued by the Secretary. Additionally failure to comply with the provisions of the facility’s approved site security plan can result in the Secretary bringing court action against the facility.

 

The courts are authorized by this legislation to require the facility to comply with the issued orders or site security plans. Additionally, they may fine the facility up to $50,000 per violation or per each day the facility fails to comply with the regulation. This is up from the $25,000 specified in the current CFATS regulations.

 

Unauthorized Disclosure

 

This section provides for the penalties for the unauthorized disclosure of the sensitive information relating to the security of covered chemical facilities {defined in Section 2108(f)}. Any officer or employee of any government agency that unlawfully discloses such information shall be imprisoned for up to one year and/or fined. Federal officers or employees will be fired or removed from office.

 

Government contractors and facility employee representatives are also given access to the same information and similarly prohibited from disclosing the information. There is no mention in this section of fines or imprisonment being applicable to either in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. This oversight needs to be corrected in the final version of this legislation.

 

Treatment of Information

 

This section also specifies how the sensitive information described in Section 2108 will be handled in court or administrative actions covered in this legislation. Such information will be treated as if it were classified material. This is the same as the provision found in the current CFATS regulations.

Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)