Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< The cost of repla
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Update of CSAT We >
Thursday, May 8, 2008
May 2008
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-30-08
Chemical Incident Review – 5-31-08
Ballistic Attacks on Hazmat Shipping
Ballistic Protection for Railcars
Commercial Comments
HR 5577 Status Update – 5-29-08
Ethanol Producers as Chemical Facilities
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-23-08
Security Equipment Review 5-28-08
Another DHS FAQ Update for 5-23-08
Reader Question 5-24-08
Industrial Chemicals as Weapons of Mass Destruction
Canadians Notice Farm Bill Chemical Security Grants
Chemical Terrorism Insurance?
Public Law 110-234
Another DHS FAQ update – 5-23-08
Farm Bill Passes Over Bush Veto – Maybe
DHS FAQ Update – 5-22-08
Teaching Chemical Facility Security
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-20-08
Hazmat Rail Routes and the Mayo Clinic
Reader Questions 5-20-08
Possible Chemical Attack Averted
Infrastructure Protection Activities Grants Awarded
Ammonia Safety Information
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-16-08
National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center
To Stop an Attack, Spot the Surveillance
HR2419 Update 05-14-08
IST In New Jersey
Updates of CSAT Top Screen Manuals
Blog Comment 5-12-08
Updates of CSAT Registration Manuals
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-9-08
Security Guard Background Checks
Potential DHS PHISHING Alert
Update of CSAT Web Page and Manuals
Reverse 911 System Exercise
The cost of replacing Chlorine
Cloned Vehicles
Vacation
Alternative to HR 5577
Reader Comments – 05-02-08
Chemical Security Legislation Influenced by Lobbyists
Chemical Sector Security Summit Registration Available
Bizarre Anhydrous Ammonia Release
Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577
« May 2008 Archive
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Subject: Reverse 911 System Exercise
Time: 6:02:00 PM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



This is a follow-up to an earlier blog (see: "Emergency Response Exercise – Hamilton County, TN") about an evaluation of a local Reverse 911 System during a chemical response drill. A recent article on TimesFreePress.com reported on the results from the exercise. During the exercise 500 people living within 1.5 miles of the training center were called by the Reverse 911 system and notified that a training exercise was taking place.

Reverse 911 System Evaluation

The Reverse 911 system contacted someone in just a little over 1/3 of the calls made (177). About 20% (102) of the calls reached answering machines. What is not known is how many of those messages left on answering machines would have reached real people in a timely manner. Less than 100 of the numbers dialed resulted in busy signals or no answer. More than 20% of the calls (109) resulted in ‘network errors’. No explanation was given for the probable causes of those errors.

Unfortunately nothing in the report allows county emergency personnel to evaluate how effective the Reverse 911 System was at notifying people in the area. To do this there would have had to be a door-to-door canvas of the neighborhood to find out how many people had been present and how many had been notified via the system. This would be a valuable piece of data to have.

Lessons Learned

The local fire chief was quoted in the newspaper article as saying "It’s important that (Reverse 911) works because it’s the best way to ... get the message out to evacuate and get to safety,"

I’m not sure that the 1/3 contact rate seen in this exercise would be considered an adequate notification rate for an evacuation. The next best alternative is to go door to door to make notification, a manpower intensive exercise at best. Considering that the people going door to door are facing potential exposure to the chemical of concern and the safety of that system is suspect. Emergency sirens or alarms could be used, but they are able to transmit only limited information.

Hamilton County, TN is looking into adding cell phone numbers to their Reverse 911 System, according to a fire department spokesman. This makes some sense if the number used can be targeted for a specific area. The FCC is working on a system that would allow an emergency message to be targeted to all cell phones in a given area (based on cell tower locations).

Considerations for Emergency Response Messages

In a toxic chemical release emergency there are going to be four potential responses for people in the area around the release. The worst case is that people in the highest concentrations of the toxic cloud will need to don protective clothing (perhaps just a respirator). The next nearest area of exposure will need to shelter-in-place. People a little further away from the incident will be able to safely evacuate before toxic levels of the chemical reach them. The final group of people will need to take no special precautions due to how far they are removed from the incident.

An emergency notification system must be able to take into account the different response required for different locations. Giving sound advice to the wrong people makes that advice ineffective at best. At worst that advice could be deadly.



Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)