Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Security Guard Ba
Friday, May 9, 2008
Updates of CSAT R >
Monday, May 12, 2008
May 2008
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-30-08
Chemical Incident Review – 5-31-08
Ballistic Attacks on Hazmat Shipping
Ballistic Protection for Railcars
Commercial Comments
HR 5577 Status Update – 5-29-08
Ethanol Producers as Chemical Facilities
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-23-08
Security Equipment Review 5-28-08
Another DHS FAQ Update for 5-23-08
Reader Question 5-24-08
Industrial Chemicals as Weapons of Mass Destruction
Canadians Notice Farm Bill Chemical Security Grants
Chemical Terrorism Insurance?
Public Law 110-234
Another DHS FAQ update – 5-23-08
Farm Bill Passes Over Bush Veto – Maybe
DHS FAQ Update – 5-22-08
Teaching Chemical Facility Security
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-20-08
Hazmat Rail Routes and the Mayo Clinic
Reader Questions 5-20-08
Possible Chemical Attack Averted
Infrastructure Protection Activities Grants Awarded
Ammonia Safety Information
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-16-08
National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center
To Stop an Attack, Spot the Surveillance
HR2419 Update 05-14-08
IST In New Jersey
Updates of CSAT Top Screen Manuals
Blog Comment 5-12-08
Updates of CSAT Registration Manuals
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-9-08
Security Guard Background Checks
Potential DHS PHISHING Alert
Update of CSAT Web Page and Manuals
Reverse 911 System Exercise
The cost of replacing Chlorine
Cloned Vehicles
Vacation
Alternative to HR 5577
Reader Comments – 05-02-08
Chemical Security Legislation Influenced by Lobbyists
Chemical Sector Security Summit Registration Available
Bizarre Anhydrous Ammonia Release
Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577
« May 2008 Archive
Monday, May 12, 2008
Subject: Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-9-08
Time: 10:15:00 AM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



There are currently three rules recently published in the Federal Register dealing with the security and safety of rail transportation of various hazardous chemicals. All three rules are in the comment period. Generally speaking the comments made on each of these rules are posted on the Regulations.gov web site. The last review was posted on 4-28-08 (see: "Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 4-25-08").

PIH Tank Car Rule

Comments are to be submitted by June 2, 2008. The FRA added a number of additional documents to the docket file. There were no other comments on this docket. The added documents were:

Route Security Analysis Rule

Comments are to be submitted by May 16, 2008. No new comments filed.

Appeal of Adverse Rail Routing Decisions Rule

Comments are to be submitted by June 16, 2008. No comments have been posted since the proposed rule was published.

Commentary

The lack of public comment on these three rules is disappointing. The Federal rule making structure relies on the input of private citizens, organizations, and companies to ensure that the rules used to regulate the country are the product of the views of both the government and the governed.

While the first two rules are on their second round of comments, the original comments were made some time ago and do not necessarily remain germane. This is especially true when you consider how much these rules have changed since they were last published for comments. Additionally, there were specific requests for information and comments in the current proposed rules.

The most controversial of these three rules, the Route Security Analysis Rule, has had no public comments. I find this particularly surprising considering the vehemence expressed in comments on this blog (see: "Another comment related to Railroad Hazmat Route Selection Rule"). The comment period for this rule ends this coming Friday. It will be interesting to see what happens between now and then.



Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)