Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< To Stop an Attack
Friday, May 16, 2008
Comments on Rail  >
Monday, May 19, 2008
May 2008
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-30-08
Chemical Incident Review – 5-31-08
Ballistic Attacks on Hazmat Shipping
Ballistic Protection for Railcars
Commercial Comments
HR 5577 Status Update – 5-29-08
Ethanol Producers as Chemical Facilities
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-23-08
Security Equipment Review 5-28-08
Another DHS FAQ Update for 5-23-08
Reader Question 5-24-08
Industrial Chemicals as Weapons of Mass Destruction
Canadians Notice Farm Bill Chemical Security Grants
Chemical Terrorism Insurance?
Public Law 110-234
Another DHS FAQ update – 5-23-08
Farm Bill Passes Over Bush Veto – Maybe
DHS FAQ Update – 5-22-08
Teaching Chemical Facility Security
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-20-08
Hazmat Rail Routes and the Mayo Clinic
Reader Questions 5-20-08
Possible Chemical Attack Averted
Infrastructure Protection Activities Grants Awarded
Ammonia Safety Information
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-16-08
National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center
To Stop an Attack, Spot the Surveillance
HR2419 Update 05-14-08
IST In New Jersey
Updates of CSAT Top Screen Manuals
Blog Comment 5-12-08
Updates of CSAT Registration Manuals
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-9-08
Security Guard Background Checks
Potential DHS PHISHING Alert
Update of CSAT Web Page and Manuals
Reverse 911 System Exercise
The cost of replacing Chlorine
Cloned Vehicles
Vacation
Alternative to HR 5577
Reader Comments – 05-02-08
Chemical Security Legislation Influenced by Lobbyists
Chemical Sector Security Summit Registration Available
Bizarre Anhydrous Ammonia Release
Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577
« May 2008 Archive
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Subject: National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center
Time: 10:37:00 AM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



I ran across a brief article on OSHOnline.com about the establishment of Regional Incident Survey Teams. According to the article the International Association of Fire Chiefs is looking for people to apply to be on one of the five survey teams that will provide field support for the National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

The fusion center under development is a cooperative effort of the IAFC and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) of the U.S. DOT. Its purpose is to serve as a clearinghouse for information for first responders about Hazmat incidents. As such it will collect information on hazmat incidents, provide analysis of that information and disseminate the information and analysis to the hazmat responder community.

 

With PHMSA being the lead federal agency (though certainly not the only federal agency involved), it would seem inevitable that the primary focus will be on hazmat incidents in transportation. This focus would seem reasonable with so many hazmat response incidents involving transportation issues. Having said that I am hoping that incidents at fixed sites receive appropriate attention.

 

Hazmat Responders in Incident Response Planning

 

This would seem to be an appropriate place to remind chemical facility planners to remember that part of any site security plan should be the Incident Response Plan. While the main focus of the site security plan is rightfully the prevention of a hazmat release due to a successful terrorist attack, any realistic plan should include provisions for dealing with the consequences of a successful attack.

 

Since local hazmat teams are going to be involved in any such response, they should be intimately involved in the process of developing the Incident Response Plan. The NHMFC should help to develop protocols for developing such plans. Such standards would be a great assistance to high-risk chemical facilities and their local hazmat teams across the country.

 

Chemical Vulnerability Information Requirements

 

If hazmat teams are going to be involved in the development of Incident Response Plans for high-risk chemical facilities, they need to be cleared for access to Chemical Vulnerability Information (CVI). This is not an onerous requirement. The on-line training is readily available and it does not take long to complete.

 

Hazmat teams do need to be made aware of the need to complete the training and obtaining the associated DHS certification. This is another area that the NHMFC can take the lead. Encouraging local hazmat teams to complete this training is a first step to making these teams an integral part of the incident response planning process.



Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)