Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Chemical Terroris
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Industrial Chemic >
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
May 2008
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-30-08
Chemical Incident Review – 5-31-08
Ballistic Attacks on Hazmat Shipping
Ballistic Protection for Railcars
Commercial Comments
HR 5577 Status Update – 5-29-08
Ethanol Producers as Chemical Facilities
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-23-08
Security Equipment Review 5-28-08
Another DHS FAQ Update for 5-23-08
Reader Question 5-24-08
Industrial Chemicals as Weapons of Mass Destruction
Canadians Notice Farm Bill Chemical Security Grants
Chemical Terrorism Insurance?
Public Law 110-234
Another DHS FAQ update – 5-23-08
Farm Bill Passes Over Bush Veto – Maybe
DHS FAQ Update – 5-22-08
Teaching Chemical Facility Security
DHS FAQ Page Update – 5-20-08
Hazmat Rail Routes and the Mayo Clinic
Reader Questions 5-20-08
Possible Chemical Attack Averted
Infrastructure Protection Activities Grants Awarded
Ammonia Safety Information
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-16-08
National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center
To Stop an Attack, Spot the Surveillance
HR2419 Update 05-14-08
IST In New Jersey
Updates of CSAT Top Screen Manuals
Blog Comment 5-12-08
Updates of CSAT Registration Manuals
Comments on Rail Security and Safety Rules – 5-9-08
Security Guard Background Checks
Potential DHS PHISHING Alert
Update of CSAT Web Page and Manuals
Reverse 911 System Exercise
The cost of replacing Chlorine
Cloned Vehicles
Vacation
Alternative to HR 5577
Reader Comments – 05-02-08
Chemical Security Legislation Influenced by Lobbyists
Chemical Sector Security Summit Registration Available
Bizarre Anhydrous Ammonia Release
Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577
« May 2008 Archive
Saturday, May 24, 2008
Subject: Canadians Notice Farm Bill Chemical Security Grants
Time: 3:01:00 PM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



Not long after posting today’s first blog entry on the Farm Bill officially becoming law I ran into an interesting article over at OilWeek.com. Is seems that the Canadian Association of Agri-Retailers is already complaining about the unfair advantage American agriculture now has since the new Farm bill "includes tax credits and grants to enhance security of crop nutrients, herbicides and pesticides".

Two Canadian organizations, the retailers and the Grain Growers of Canada, are trying to get the Canadian government to come across with similar grants or tax credits to level the playing field. They are afraid that they will be faced with the problem of paying for increased chemical security out-of-pocket and not being able to pass those costs on to their customers. After all, those customers could go to American suppliers.

This brings up an interesting possibility; Canadian agricultural chemical suppliers could ask NAFTA to throw out those grants and tax credits as an unfair government subsidy of agricultural production. Wouldn’t that be fun?

Here we thought the Farm Bill fight was over until the 2012 reauthorization rolls around.



Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)