Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Chemical Facility Security News

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< SVA – Computer Sy
Monday, July 14, 2008
DHS FAQ Page Upda >
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
July 2008
House Passes HR 4806 and HR 6193
HR 4806 Status Update 7-24-08
The Future of Al Qaeda
HR 6193 Status Update 7-28-08
Security vs Freedom of the Press
DHS FAQ Update 7-25-08
House Homeland Security Committee Hearings – 7-28-08
Water Supply Security
Too Much Faith in Biometrics?
HR5577 Lobbying Effort
PHMSA Issues Request for Comments
Critical Infrastructure Partnership Advisory Council Meeting
Evolving Eco-Terrorist Groups - Update
Alternatives to CFATS for Theft/Diversion Chemicals
Evolving Eco-Terrorist Groups
DHS FAQ Update 7-18-08
Chemical Incident Review 7-21-08
Changes to DHS Chemical Security Web Pages – 7-18-08
CSAT Tier Rankings
Reader Recommendation
Control System Security
DHS Web Page Updated
Call for SCADA Security Papers
DHS FAQ Update 07-15-08
SVA – Finishing the Report
DHS FAQ Page Update 7-11-08
Update HR 5577  07-11-08
SVA – Computer Systems Analysis
Chemical Sector Security Summit Web Agenda
Review: IP Surveillance 101
CSB Reports on Valero Refinery Fire
Chemical Sector Security Summit Page Updated 07-11-08
Chemical Sector Security Summit Page Updated 07-09-08
DHS Science and Technology Advisory Council Meeting 07-15-08
A New Chemical Facility Security Blog
SVA – Attack Scenarios – Vulnerability Factors
ACC Response to Lobbying Criticism
CFATS Misunderstandings
DHS FAQ Page Update 07-03-08
SVA – Attack Scenarios – Scenario Development
Review: Security Manager's Guide to Video Surveillance
Video Surveillance Information
Chemical Incident Review – 7-3-08
DHS Information Network Advisory Committee Meeting
SVA – Attack Scenarios – Getting Started
DHS FAQ Page Updates 7-1-08
SVA – Characterization of COI Assets
Mea Culpa
« July 2008 Archive
Monday, July 14, 2008
Subject: Update HR 5577  07-11-08
Time: 12:11:00 PM EDT
Author:  pjcoyle



The House Leadership has once again caved on their responsibility to see to it that important security legislation moves through the Congress. They provided the House Committee on Energy and Commerce another extension for the review of HR 5577. This extension runs until September 12th. This ensures that this bill will not make it to a floor vote during the current session.

Next year the current CFATS authorization runs out in October. With no prospect of that authorization being extended this year, there is every incentive for high-risk facilities to use every stalling tactic in the regulations to avoid spending any further money on security procedures or equipment. Why should they spend money when the regulation requiring that expenditure is slated to expire before they can be forced to spend the money? Why spend money on a dead end program when an entirely new program will be written next year that may require a completely different type of security program?

The sad thing is that Speaker Pelosi will be the first to complain about the administration’s foot dragging on chemical security if an attack does occur. The Speaker and Chairman Dingle need to have their feet held to the fire about their inability to move this legislation forward.



Written by pjcoyle Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)