Subject: Comment from Woods of Wonder
Time: 12:03:00 PM EDT
Author: ddawncrawford71
Mood: Chillin'
Music: Who's more dangerous Bush or Bin Laden?
Interesting video and you make your point.
Bin Laden, although surely a figurehead for violence, is not firmly connected
to 9/11 at all. Bin Laden's role as it has been insinuated by the media
is largely unsubstantiated, if not purely mythical.
A myriad of alleged Bin Laden audio and video messages have contained references to 9/11. Most are questionable. Many have been flatly debunked.
Like the infamous "Bin Laden video"
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
A man holed up in a cave is hardly in any position to design or fund
such an operation.
Who has, on the other hand, been proven to have wired 100,000 dollars ro Atta? A Pakistaniintelligence-linked official. An official who is rather close to
the administration:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/jul/22/usa.september11
The FBIs Bin Laden profile doesn't even make one mention of 9/11
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
Why? In their words " because we have no evidence linking him to the events of 911".
In short, virtually nothing is really known about 9/11. Yet wars have been instigated in its name. The war on terror is a complete joke.
Best wishes,
woodsofwonder.
Written by ddawncrawford71 Blog about this entry
