Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

The Lineup Card

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Someone Get David
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
Carl Pavano Is a  >
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
May 2007
MLB Power Rankings: Week 9
Power (Rankings) to the People Mailbag: Week 8
Cause for Concern About Jon Papelbon?
John McGraw Would Probably Punch Bobby Cox in the Face
The Gospel of Toe-Socks: Book of Dice-K
Column Breakout: More on Pythagoras
No Wonder Nobody Likes A-Rod
Quite Possibly the Best Baseball Contest Ever
It Looks Like Jason Giambi Did Other 'Stuff' Too
MLB Power Rankings: Week 8
Power (Rankings) to the People Mailbag: Week 7
Column Breakout: Pitchers and Luck
Friday Wasn't a Good Day to Be a Lancaster Jethawk
Is Ozzie Guillen Getting a Free Pass?
Interleague Play Returns, Is Still Stupid
Welcome Back to the Rivalry Early, Roger
Steroid-Using Cheaters Are Allowed to Return Early
The Red Sox of the Southeast
The Hypothetical Home Run Chase
MLB Power Rankings: Week 7
All You Ever Needed to Know About Avulsions
Joel Zumaya Has 'Jersey Finger'
A Post Featuring Tim Lincecum and Nudity
Power (Rankings) to the People: Week 6 Mailbag
Carl Pavano Is a Big Wussy Boy
Willie Mays Is Not Completely and Utterly Insane
Someone Get David Price an Orange Double-Breasted Suit
What to Expect From the Rocket; Other Random Thoughts
Power Rankings: Week 6
Power (Rankings) to the People: Week 5 Mailbag
Paradigm Shift: Is Youth Being Served?
There's Hope for Geeks Everywhere
Column Breakout: From Low Pitch Counts to the Four-Man Rotation
More on My Moby Dick (AKA Alex Gordon)
Josh Hamilton Continues to Be Totally Amazing
Of the Red Sox, the Yankees and Momentum Changes
Power Rankings: Week 5
« May 2007 Archive
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
4:59:00 AM EDT
Hearing 24

Willie Mays Is Not Completely and Utterly Insane

FanHaus blogger Larry Brown had an excellent post today on Willie Mays' Sunday Conversation with Peter Gammons aired on ESPN. In case you missed it Mays made a rather interesting claim:

  • "Gammons asked Mays whether he thought he could have hit 800 home runs if he hadn't played so many games in the windy and spacious Candlestick Park. Here was Mays' response: 'No, not that. I think the Army, if I didn't have to go into the Army, which I had to go for my country, I would've hit 800 home runs or more. Let's say I played the schedule of 110 games in the Army, that's like 40 home runs a year. So you take that and you add it on to the 660, I think I would've been way ahead of everybody.'"

Brown takes exception to Mays' claim that his military service robbed him of a chance at 800 homers, and I agree with him on that point, but if Mays had played in a different environment could he have had a shot at 800?

If we go to Baseball Prospectus' Davenport Translations, we can find out. The DTs adjust a players statistics to a completely neutral offensive environment -- both historically and in terms of ballpark. As you're probably well aware, offensive performance fluctuates wildly over different eras and the DTs attempt to compensate for that. A roughly neutral offensive environment and park, just in case you're having trouble imagining it, is somewhat akin to Kansas City's Kaufmann Stadium in the 1980s.

So how many homers would Mays have hit if we remove him from Candlestick Park in the 1950s and 1960s and put him in this hypothetical neutral environment? According to the DTs, 856. Maybe Willie isn't so crazy after all? Or at least Peter Gammons' question wasn't.



Written by deskblog Blog about this entry
This entry has 1 comments: (Add your own)
  • #1 Comment from gposner29 
    6/30/07 10:46 AM Permalink
    TODAY'S "YUTE" HAS BEEN "CHEATED" OUT OF SEEING WILLIE MAYS AND HANK AARON DO THEIR THING FOR SO MANY YEARS.  BONDS, ROIDED UP AND WEARING A SUIT OF ARMOR EVERYTIME HE STEPS IN THE BOX, AGAINST TRIPLE A PITCHERS, IN TINY PARKS, WITH A LIVLIER BALL, COULDN'T CARRY THE SPIKES OF MAYS OR AARON, LET ALONE RUTH. BONDS DIDN'T START OUT AS A PITCHER DID HE? BONDS DIDN'T SERVE HIS COUNTRY, DID HE? CASE CLOSED.