Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

The Adventist Way of Life

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Denominationalism
Monday, April 14, 2008
Ellen & the T >
Monday, April 14, 2008
April 2008
Bent doctrines of Wayne Bent
"Great swelling words!"
Answer for SDA cult bloggers
Is the Trinity pagan?
Response to "Ed White" Group
Response for POGM Group
Response for CSDA Group
Grace & Truth
Addressing the 3rd Angel's Message
Once saved, once lost
Our Salvation SURE in Christ Jesus!
Third Angel's Message
Second Angel's Message
First Angel's Message
Salvation & Growth in Christ
To know Him
Response to JW cult
Answering food issues
God's Kingdom!
Come out of Babylon!
The Artaxerxes 457BC Decree
The Beast wants your worship
Problems in Colosse
Morals & Dogma
Sabbath Observance
From Sabbath to Sabbath
Jesus broke the Sabbath?
Evangelical Sabbath Debate
4th commandment Jewish?
Grace & Truth
Response to Antinomianism
Teachers of the Law
Who's righteousness?
What "Great Controversy"?
Have you escaped?
Jewish Nation Predestined
Biblical sanctification
Christians are free from the Law
Election & Predestination
Salvation assurance
Reconciliation and Acceptance
Sabbath observance
Have we fallen asleep?
Traditions...are they Christian?
Personal Forgiveness
Christian Growth
Jesus gave His all!
Getting along
Fundamentalism & Freedom
Brief "Adventist Way of Life" history
Christian forgiveness
Walking with Jesus
What are you looking for?
Ellen and photography
Ellen & the Trinity
Christians and creeds
Denominationalism
American Youth
Michael the Archangel
Christians and politics
Church built on Ellen G. White?
E.G.White and plagiarism
Symbolic language
The current Apostasy
The 1260 year Great Tribulation
"Remember" means what?
Is your veil lifted?
Traces of God's Morality
The Five Sola's
Falsely accused!
Must we speculate?
"Feel good" religion?
Jesus Came for what?
Response to Vegetarianism
How narrow is the Christian Path?
Do I have to be perfect?
« April 2008 Archive
Monday, April 14, 2008
4:41:00 PM EDT

Christians and creeds

Should Christians have "creeds"? The simple answer is, NO! Why? As a Seventh Day Adventist Christian I can tell you that our church has always been against the development of a "Christian Creed". There are many reasons for this. First, just what is a "creed"?

Basically, a creed is a statement of beliefs or a "confession of faith". The word creed derives from the Latin: credo for "I believe" and credimus "for we believe". The early Christian church is said to have developed creeds as a "token" [symbol] by which people of like beliefs might agree and recognize each other.

There are many early creeds. The Roman Catholics developed the famous "Apostles Creed". This creed has been handed down to some protestant groups as well. During the reformation of the early church the Lutherans developed their famous, "Augsburg Confession" and we see that many churches today still use creeds and continue to develop creeds.

Here is the problem with Christian creeds: Man has used man-made creeds to start wars. Man has held these creeds above the Bible itself. Man has not allowed a creed to be changed when error was found. In this sense, creeds have become cement for theological error and human arrogance.

This is why early Adventist Christian, J.N. Loughborough stated:

"The first step of apostasy is to get up a creed, telling us what we shall believe. The second is, to make that creed a test of fellowship. The third is to try members by that creed. The fourth to denounce as heretics those who do not believe that creed. And fifth, to commence persecution against such."

This brings us to the question; Why then does the Seventh Day Adventist Church have a list of 28 beliefs that they refer to as; "The 28 Fundamentals"? And here is my official response to that question.....

One: Seventh Day Adventists have made a list of basic fundamentals derived from the Bible itself and at the end of each fundamental belief there is a list of Scriptures that validate the doctrines in question.

Two: One does NOT have to accept all of the 28 fundamentals to be a Seventh Day Adventist Christian. With "creeds" they have always been a "test of faith". One must believe all the statements of the creed to be a part of this sect or that. But not with the SDA 28 Fundamentals.

Three: Then why have 28 Fundamentals? The Bible commands us to be in basic unity and to always be ready to "give an answer for the hope that lies within". For these reasons they were developed. The 28 SDA Fundamentals can be changed or re-worded as God's Holy Spirit directs. The 28 Fundamentals are descriptors not prescriptors; that is, that they describe the official position of the church but are not a criterion for membership.

So please understand our position as Seventh Day Adventist Christians regarding the issue of "creeds". Here is what the introduction of our list of 28 Fundamentals begins with;

"Seventh-day Adventists accept the Bible as their only creed and hold certain fundamental beliefs to be the teaching of the Holy Scriptures. These beliefs, as set forth here, constitute the church's understanding and expression of the teaching of Scripture. Revision of these statements may be expected at a General Conference session when the church is led by the Holy Spirit to a fuller understanding of Bible truth or finds better language in which to express the teachings of God's Holy Word."

To read all 28 Fundamentals click here.

Written by, Eric W. King [January 5,2008]



Written by er2ki Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)