March 2006
3/31/06
3/26/06
3/20/06
3/20/06
3/17/06
3/16/06
3/15/06
3/15/06
3/13/06
3/11/06
3/10/06
3/10/06
3/9/06
3/8/06
IM Surveillance
3/8/06
3/7/06
3/6/06
3/6/06
3/3/06
Wednesday, March 8, 2006
Yesterday there was an op-ed piece
in The Washington Post, by Ruth Marcus, that discussed how parents are
using "domestic surveillance"for instant messaging to watch who
their kids are interacting with. With stories popping up more
frequently on the news of police investigations in child kidnapping and
even worse being tied to MySpace and other social profile sites, I think the article brings about an interesting debate
on how much oversight parents should have over their child's online
activities. I would love to hear what your opinion is on this
topic. Leave a comment below.
Check back later today I will be posting on day 3 of ETech.
gregsblog at 10:00:00 AM EST Blog about this entry
IM Surveillance
Check back later today I will be posting on day 3 of ETech.
gregsblog at 10:00:00 AM EST Blog about this entry
3/8/06 11:18 AM
Though, their fears over cyber-evil and such aren't completely unfounded, but they _are_ highly exacerbated through media fearmongering. What better to get people to watch than "Your child could be talking to a psychopath RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE."
Basically, the point is this: I was raised without any internet restrictions from a very early age, as long as it didn't affect my school work, and now I'm a grade A web backend developer who works at a high level for an multi-national corporation, and I've been doing it since I was 16 (I'm 21 now, and graduate next year). I have a good social group and am well-adjusted. Perhaps I'm just the exception to the rule-- who knows. *shrug*