Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

By The Way...

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Avast!
Friday, September 19, 2003
Best. Rock Critic >
Friday, September 19, 2003
September 2003
Notes From All Over
Technological Dead-Ends
Movies On Demand
Just a Small Extra Charge
What Are They Saying?
Your Documents, Please
One Small Request
Insensate With Glee
Already?
The Coolest News Story of the Day
Gesundheit, Mr. President
Capitals in Your URLS
Cheese!
On Searching
Friday Fun!
Poverty and News Cycles
Friday Entertainment Notes
What? Another Debate?
Comment No-Nos
Food Glorious Food
My Teeth, Recapped (it's a pun!)
The Newlyweds, Recapped
All Around the World
The Debate -- Or TRON?
My Teef! My Teef!
Mmmm...Rising Stars
What They Said
Favorite Sites and Other Journals
Better Off?
Busy Busy Busy
Doom!
Mom at Work
The Tigers' Magic Number is 2
Finding Other Journals, Part II
Meow, Baby
Finding Other Journals, Part I
Sickness
The Emmys!
Music to Your Ears
You Are There
Fall, Sunday, Etc.
Goodbye Galileo
One Way of Doing It
Asking for Links
A Clean Slate?
Best. Rock Criticism. EVER.
A Good Reason to Move to England
Avast!
AOL Journalers On...
Go Vols!
Your Change, Sir
Good News
Arrr!
Criticism
Clark: I'm In. Who's Out?
Miscellaneous Links
Knock, Knock. Who's There?
Speel Chekk
Breakfast of Champions!
Good News for Bad Typists
Multiple Pictures
Can't Get No Satisfaction
Isabel's Impending Visit
Ooooh -- a contest.
Pictures in Your Journal -- A New Way
A Gray Day
Upgrade Complete!
Upgrade
Making Lists, Making Links
Film Theory
Control Your Comments
John Ritter
Fun With Perpetual Motion
Flash Mobs: Your 15 Minutes Are Up
Duh
He Walked the Line
Disappearing Comments?
Beautiful Ordinary Day
More 9/11 Thoughts
Lawns
In their Own Words
Remembering 9/11
Back at the Cottage
Coming up from AOL Journals
Two Things
Stern and the End of the World
Finding Your Archives
Cosmic Discovery in the Key of B Flat
Sending in Links and Other Stuff
One Word: Yay!
Money -- That's What I Want!
Leni Riefenstahl
One Small Thing...
Remembering 9/11
Weird Gurls, Cool Links
The Speech and Other News
Warren Zevon
Science Moves in Strange and Mysterious (and Drunken) Ways
AOL Journaler Links
Fall is Here
Obligatory Cat Picture
Insanely Fun
Appetite Shot Down
That's Entertainment!
Cover This
Big Brother with a Boombox
A Small, Small World
Thrown Out
Security Issues
The Hit Counter
Oooh! My first review!
Are You Ready For Some Football, Blah Blah Blah
Note to Self: You're Old
Bye Bye CDs
Making Links
More Sarcasm, Please
Overturned
You're Rich!
Change and Style
Pasting HTML
Look! In The Sky!
Going Home
« September 2003 Archive
Friday, September 19, 2003
11:16:00 AM EDT
Hearing Get the Part Started -- Pink

A Good Reason to Move to England


The United Kingdom outlaws spam -- and, rather more importantly, imposes a hefty fine ($8,000+) for people convicted of spamming. Loophole: This ban only covers personal addresses, not business addresses. So you can still lose productivity at work! Still, even that would be better than what we have here in the US. My personal (non-AOL) address receives something like 500 pieces of spam each day. It's on the high end of the amount of spam people receive, I admit. My name's out there a bit more than most. But that doesn't make it any less annoying to me. I don't need to refinance my mortgage 75 times a day or add girth to various body parts every five minutes.

The UKs financial penalties won't stop the spam, of course; you have to find the spammers first, and then you have to pry them out of their fetid holes before you can sue them. But someone who does have the time and inclination to track them down can make them pay, literally, and clearly money is the only language spammers understand. As much pleasure one would receive in slathering a spammer in bacon fat and throwing him into a pit filled with starving rats from New York City, extracting cash from his bank account would be even nicer.

The US doesn't have financial penalties for spammers. Should we? Clearly, you can guess what I think about this. Tell me what you think. And if you think the answer is no -- why on earth not?



Written by johnmscalzi Blog about this entry
This entry has 3 comments: (Add your own)
  • #3 Comment from admhantai 
    9/19/03 12:30 PM Permalink
    Step in the right direction? Yes, but a pathetically small and ineffective one. With some luck this'll have some impact on SMS messages in the middle of the night. It won't affect e-mail spam at all.
  • #2 Comment from admhantai 
    9/19/03 12:30 PM Permalink
    Problem 2: The fine is tiny, limited to 8k unles the trial goes to jury (8k is nothing to a spammer), cannot grow based on scope of offense, never comes into play at all unless you ignore a cease order first, and most of all, applies to the UK only when only a tiny minority of spam actually originates in the UK.

  • #1 Comment from admhantai 
    9/19/03 12:30 PM Permalink
    Problem 1: >>Loophole: This ban only covers personal addresses, not business addresses.<< Define 'persnal address'. My PA is hantai@nospambots.over-clock.co.uk; but o-c is a computer store and I run their servers, be sure I'll be spammed to death legally even tho 99% of legit mail on that accout is strictly personal and I have no other personal address.