Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

By The Way...

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Debt, Debt, Debt
Monday, October 13, 2003
Bummer, Dude >
Monday, October 13, 2003
October 2003
Halloween Games
People Doing Dumb Things
Real Estate From Beyond the Grave!
Oh No! It's The Spooky Eye!
Reader Award Nominations
The Martians are Coming!
Big Brother Parents
Harry Potter and the Headache of Doom
Following Up
LeBron Mania
Something Soothing
A Quick Jaunt Through the Journals
Why is This Dog Smiling?
A Tall Moment
Sidebar Pictures
Picturing Science
Halloween Goodness
Mmmm... Pumpkin-y!
Linking Text
Funny Money
The Saddest Link You'll Click Today
The Fires This Time
Not Just For Dogs Anymore
The Manchurian Spectacles
More Fall Foliage
Another Random Collection
Go Fish!
Meat Food Product
Random Subjects
Your Friday Music Selection
Spammers Get Creative
Here Comes the Sun. No, Really.
A Parental Question
A Dangerous Living
Can't See The Forest, Etc.
Adventures in Public Domain
Cough, Cough
AOL Journaler Doings
Spamalama Ding-Dong
Editor's Picks, Revisited
The Cost of Education
Fall Colors
Entry Point
Doing Too Much?
Saying a Lot With a Little
Editor's Picks
Sir, Step Away From the Photoshop
Dumb
15 Hours of Fame Questions
A Little Botany For You.
Back That Up
Another Round
Mad Scientists!
Because I Am All About Journaler Service
Your Link for Good Health!
14 Years
The Answer Every Cat Lover Should Know
Some AOL Journal Wanderings
Fooled by April
This is Kind of Sad on My Part
You Want to Implant What Where Now?
Rank Hypocrisy on My Part
What All The Cool Kids Are Linking To Today
iTunes
She Lives!
One Last Cubbies Entry...
Literally Crashing the Computer
The Beloved Steve Bartman?
Like, Whoa, Man.
Manhattan Mortgage Madness!
Liver Crushing
Help and Suggestions
Clarifications
My Weather
Married Minority?
Bye-Bye Ovaries
Your People Call It Corn
Tweaking Sidebars
Bummer, Dude
Corporate Kiddies
Debt, Debt, Debt
Drive Yourself Nuts
Low Rider
Uppity AOL Journalers!
Weekend Project, Part II
My Weekend Project
Cubs Fans Strike Back!
An Observation Before Your Friday Game
News Bits
Ah hah hah hah hah!
The Cubs and Red Sox Must Go Down
Ow. Ow. OW.
Extra Journals
Fun Disclaimer
Meow, Baby
Parking Lots, Oddly Enough
Kick It
Plus Signs Killed Dead
Boom!
Cats and Gender
Another Sort of October Madness
AOL Journalers on the Election
SCALZI CAUGHT IN LOVE TRIANGLE!
PolitiBlog
Blog Stuff
A Quicksilver Interview
Here We Go
Indie All The Way
Fun With License Plates
The Blog World Gives
More Technical Glitches
Baby, Don't You Want to Go
Weekend Goodies
An Entire Nation With the Munchies
Technical Notes
Hello, Dolly
Another Reason to Read The Paper
Art For Art's Sake
Journal Notes
The Dreaded "+" Sign
Making Music
Whoops
Balance This
A Hot Five
Meanwhile, in the UK...
Drive Time
Yup, it's October
« October 2003 Archive
Monday, October 13, 2003
5:33:00 PM EDT
Hearing Hunger Strike -- Temple of the Dog

Corporate Kiddies

Picture from Hometown

Okay, I'm really interested to hear what you all think about this story: Corporations are providing product-branded teaching materials to preschools around the country, imparting basic learning lessons along with product placement for companies like Pizza Hut, Ford, and toy maker Milton Bradley. Teachers and other educators seem to be conflicted about the materials: On one hand, it's advertising. On the other hand, anyone who's been to a preschool knows they often need all the teaching materials they can get.

I personally don't like it. Like any parent, I'm fighting a rear-guard battle to make sure my daughter doesn't get sucked into the consumer culture early. I won an early battle when I convinced her TV advertising was the work of the devil (Me: "Hey Athena! What are TV commercials?" Athena: "They're evil, daddy!"), but lately she's been seduced by the Bratz line of dolls, a product line whose entire point is to inculcuate the idea that nearly all of life's problems can be solved by shopping, facial scrubs and flared jeans. I hate them with a white-hot intensity. But Athena says to me, "I know they're evil, daddy. But I don't care." Indeed, she loves bringing in her Bratz material (provided by my wife) and waving it in my face mockingly. She's four, man. She's already mocking her old man with stuff. It's cute but disturbing. I blame myself. But I blame the Bratz more.

Given this sort of behavior, I don't see how exposing her or any other kid to even more product placement is going to be a good thing, especially when parents don't have a choice, save withdrawing their kid from preschool, which usually isn't a realistic option. But I'm also willing to believe I might be more worried about it than I need to be. I do remember various corporate initiatives in my elementary school when I was a kid (and of course, there was all that Sesame Stuff, which, while starting from an education point of view, wasn't exactly entirely innocent of branding), and I got through it just fine. So maybe it's not as big a deal to other people as I think.

It doesn't change how I feel, though. And heaven forbid my daughter's preschool should ever hand out Bratz educational worksheets (or "worksheetz," as I'm sure they'd be called). I think the top of my head would just pop right off.

Your thoughts, please.



Written by johnmscalzi Blog about this entry
This entry has 7 comments: (Add your own)
  • #7 Comment from clarity4today 
    10/15/03 3:38 PM Permalink
    It's just a bad idea. Children are already influenced enough by advertising they see on television. I can't imagine anything positive to be gained by their exposure to additional attempts to influence them. Donna
    http://journals.aol.com/clarity4today/MyUnvarnishedTruth/
  • #6 Comment from tenpinproduction 
    10/14/03 12:30 PM Permalink
    Yabbut what's FORD doing trying to market themselves to pre-schoolers? Do they seriously think that the kid's still going to be brand-loyal to something they saw/connected with preschool? For instance, you couldn't pay me to wear Oshgosh overalls now, even if they *did* make them for adults.
  • #5 Comment from tenpinproduction 
    10/14/03 12:30 PM Permalink
    Yabbut what's FORD doing trying to market themselves to pre-schoolers? Do they seriously think that the kid's still going to be brand-loyal to something they saw/connected with preschool? For instance, you couldn't pay me to wear Oshgosh overalls now, even if they *did* make them for adults.
  • #4 Comment from aynetal3 
    10/14/03 3:45 AM Permalink
    Product branding happens ... remembering "Crest" in my elementary school. You need to teach "choice making" and "figurin out what THEY value."

    And, just because I as a mom listen to nature sounds and watch very little tv, doesn't mean the my boys (19, 21, and 22) are going to "buy my hype!"

    Bring them up to be aware and discriminating, not just judgmental. *Sigh* The 21 year old bought his own "Hummer" this year. Wouldn't have been my choice. Can't reach the seat!
  • #3 Comment from babyshark28 
    10/14/03 2:12 AM Permalink
    lol, worksheetz, good one. I know exactly what you mean, I started educating my daughter at the same age as yours about commercials and how they are not what they seem "See the hand moving the barbies head, Barbies don't move on their own" at the age of 10, she is quite the critic...but, she still wants one of those bratz dolls, dang it. You can't escape, but you can help to learn to deal.
Show all comments (2 more)