Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

AOL Journals: Magic Smoke

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Fixed: Editing Jo
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
I'm Sorry, Britne >
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
June 2006
Journals Editor Joe's Fourth of July Blog Picks for 6/30
The Great Donut Debate? (and Embedded Polls)
6/29 Journals Status Update 2
Try the Moblogging (Mobile Blogging) Beta
6/29 Journals Status (R7 Beta Rolled Back)
Don't Miss These Entries
Journals R7 Release in Beta
Open Issue: Journals Database Errors
Are You 'Missing' Entries in Your Journal?
For the Fourth: Fireworks Photos and Your July 4th Blogs
That Strange Thing in the Sky That Hurts My Eyes
Drama, Manufactured and Historical
About That Moblogging Beta...
eBay Sniping and You
CLEARED: Journals Issues Due to Rostering Problems
6/27: Journals Issues Due to Rostering Problem
6/27 Journals Status: A Bad News, Good News Sort of Thing
Moist Monday
New Guest Editor's Picks for 6/23
Stormy Weather Ahead (Plus, Sidebar Material)
About That Moblogging Entry I Promised...
Jakob Nielsen on Blogs vs. Newsletters
Adding Photos to Your Journal With AOL Pictures Permalinks
This Is Not an Update
Blogging for Fun and Profit (or, "Man [Behind] for the Dixie Chicks")
Blogging for Business & Pleasure
New Guest Editor's Picks for 6/16 (Plus, a Sneak Peek at Next Week)
'Pearls' on Bloggers and Comments
Joe Explains Social Link Sharing Sites (Except Not Boring This Time)
About the Latest Weekend Assignment
Social Link Sharing and The New Netscape Beta
I'm Sorry, Britney...
Flag Day & Some Photo Tips
Fixed: Editing Journals Entries
Workaround for Editing/Deleting Existing Entries
Problems Editing Journals Entries (Plus, a Fix)
Status of R6 Fixes (AOL Pictures and Double Quotes)
Problem With Duplicate Description Text Showing Up in Header
Journals R6 Release Successfully Installed
Journals R6 Release Is "Go" for Launch, 6/13, 4am ET
New Guest Editor's Picks for 6/9
Blog Six-Pack Picks, 2.10
Watch What You Say (Redux)
Blog Six-Pack Picks, 2.9
Journals Release R6 Is Coming
Power to the People (and Serenity Now!)
Blog Six-Pack Picks, 2.8
You Know What Today Is, Right?
Blog Six-Pack Picks, 2.7
Journals Editor Joe's Blog Picks for 6/2
Live Video Stream of Space Station Spacewalk
Leveling Up in HTML Knowledge
Hello, June (and a Little Printable Propaganda)
« June 2006 Archive
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
4:28:00 PM EDT
Hearing Liz Phair, What Makes You Happy

Flag Day & Some Photo Tips

Hi folks -- blogger John beat me in getting up a Flag Day entry (in a big way, since I got sidetracked by the Journals entry edit problems this afternoon) but here's a shot of the flags outside AOL HQ in luverly Dulles, VA:

Flags Outside AOL Headquarters
Flags: US, Virginia, AOL

As anyone who knows U.S. flag etiquette knows, in a group like that, the U.S. flag should be displayed on its own right, which this one is (to an observer from outside).

On a photo note, I've talked about the advantages of digital cameras before, not the least of which is you can keep shooting and reviewing photos until you find the one that's right.

In this case, I took 10 photos before I found the right one, mostly because there wasn't enough wind to show the flags.

Why You Should Resize Photos
Now, with my camera settings, the original photo downloaded from my camera was 1600 pixels high x 1200 wide. This is really big, especially if you're just going to use it in your blog. For a three-column Journal, 450 pixels wide is about as big as you can go without causing a horizontal scroll (most monitors are 800x600).

The original pic was also 447 K, which is big for a single photo, even in the broadband world.

(Why take it so big in the first place? If you have the storage space, it's always best to shoot big, because you can always crop and resize a big pic later; you can't really make a small photo bigger and still have it look good.)

Now, you can technically mash a huge photo like this into a smaller space without cropping or resizing it, but it's not a good idea. As the saying goes, it's like "putting 10 pounds of potatoes in a 5-pound bag."

For example, when you try to scrunch a photo down without actually resizing it (you can do this by adjusting the HTML image height and width attributes to say, "Even though this picture is really 800x600, squish it down to a space that's only 600x450"), it's going to look jaggy.

Here, I did a minimal amount of editing of the photo, then cropped it to focus on the flags, and resized it to 450x600.

JPEG Image Quality vs. File Size
JPEG is the type of image file most usually associated with photographs. (You'll typically see GIFs for graphics, and of course animated GIFs.)

At the default Photoshop "High" setting for JPEGs (on a scale of 1-100, "High" is 60 -- the higher the number, the better the quality, but the bigger the file size), it was just 64 K. (At quality 100, the photo would be 120K, double the size.)

I may not know a lot of math, but 64 K is a lot better than the original 447 K. It's faster for you to upload, and it's faster for your viewers to download.

Of course, if you save a JPG photo at too low a quality, you will see JPG "compression artifacts" -- kind of squiggly, jagged, blocky areas on the photo. Photoshop and other photo editing programs often give you a way of comparing different quality levels, so you can find the smallest file size that gets you the best-looking image.

Enought photo tech talk. Here's one more of the flag photos, which I like since it tells a kind of visual joke:

Flags Outside AOL Headquarters, One Way

Get it?

Thanks -- Joe

Tags: , , ,


Written by journalseditor Blog about this entry
This entry has 3 comments: (Add your own)