Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

JUSTICE FOR TERRI SCHIAVO

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Who Was Guardian
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Helping A Sick P >
Monday, September 25, 2006
September 2006
Friday, September 22, 2006
Subject: Judge George Greer Showed No Respect for Members of the People's House
Time: 7:51:00 AM EDT
Author:  justice1949


Judge George Greer Showed No Respect for Members of the People's House
 
By Janice Sanford
Justice1949@aol.com
 
 
ALL THE EVENTS LISTED BELOW ,ACCORDING TO THE SOURCES, TOOK PLACE ON MARCH 18, 2005. Reading through each listing, I found that there was no listing for the  'Telephonic Hearing.' The hearing over the telephone in which Judge George Greer said:(Attorney Kerry Kircher represented the U.S. House of Representatives)
 
"Mr. Kircher, these issues have been important federal for years. And the fact that you -- your committee chooses to do something today doesn't create an emergency, sir. I'm sorry.
 
My order will stand...."
 
"Your Honor, if I might. This is Debbie Bushnell. I'm at the Hospice facility and it's my understanding that your order is effective immediately; is that correct?"...
 
"...Yes. I have ordered that (Terri's feeding tube be removed) and I'm within my jurisdiction and it's as good as signed, I would think...."
 
Source Pinellas County Courthouse REC. BK 14188 PG 343  
http://justiceforterrischiavo.us/telephonic.html
March 18, 2005… Schindlers file new federal action arguing due process violations in original trial; case assigned to Judge Moody [READ]
March 18, 2005… Judge Moody denies new federal claim, citing lack of jurisdiction [READ]
March 18, 2005… Congressional committee issues subpoenas for Michael, Terri, and Terri's caregivers to appear at hearing to be held at the hospice where Terri has stayed [READ]
March 18, 2005… Congressional committee files motion to intervene and modify order requiring the removal of Terri's feeding tube
March 18, 2005… Judge Greer denies congressional committee motion, ruling no grounds exist for intervention
March 18, 2005… Congressional committee requests Florida Supreme Court and Second District stay the feeding tube's removal [READ]
 
Source of Info
Abstract Appeal -- by Matt Conigliaro
 
 

March 18, 2005

The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform issues five subpoenas: one commanding Michael Schiavo to appear before it and bring with him the “hydration and nutrition equipment” in working order; three commanding physicians and other personnel at the hospice to do the same; and one commanding Ms. Schiavo to appear before it. The subpoenas would require that the PEG tube remain in working order until at least the date of testimony, March 25, 2005. The subpoenas are included as appendices to the U.S. House All Writs Petition (see just below).

The Committee onGovernment Reform also moves to intervene in the guardianship litigation before Judge Greer and asks Judge Greer to stay his order requiring removal of the PEG tube. Judge Greer denies the motions.
U.S. House Motion to Intervene
U.S. House Motion for Stay

The Committee on Government Reform files an emergency all-writs petition with the Florida Supreme Court, effectively seeking reversal of Judge Greer’s denial of its motions. The Florida Supreme Court denies this petition.
U.S. House All Writs Petition

The House Committee on Government Reform asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Florida Supreme Court’s denial of its petition. Justice Kennedy, acting for the Court, denies the application for relief.
U.S. Supreme Court Docket, Case No. SC05-449

The PEG tube is removed in mid-afternoon. This is the third time the tube has been removed in accordance with court orders.

The Schindlers, as “next friends” of their daughter, file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal district court in the Middle District of Florida. That court dismisses the case for lack of jurisdiction and refuses to issue a temporary restraining order because “there is not a substantial likelihood that [the Schindlers] will prevail on their federal constitutional claims.”

Schindlers' Habeas Corpus Petition

 
Source of info
University Of Miami - Ethics Programs
 
 
 
March 18, 2005:
The U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate attempt to the block the removal of the feeding tube, but Judge Greer rejects the moves. The feeding tube is removed for the third time in accordance with court orders.
Source of info
CBC News Indepth: Terri Schiavo
 
 
 
  • March 18: Greer strikes down the subpeona as unconstitutional and Terri's feeding tube is removed for the third and final time.
  •  
    Source of info
    Terri Schiavo timeline - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
     
     
    March 18
    A House of Representatives panel issues subpoenas for Terri Schiavo, her husband and others to appear at a hearing, but the trial judge blocks the move. The woman's feeding tube is removed. The U.S. Supreme Court rejects an emergency appeal by the House asking the justices to intervene.

    George Felos, Michael Schiavo's attorney, holds the subpoena served on his client.
    Source of info
    CNN.com
     
     
     
    The Bio-ethics department of the University of Miami has an excellent timeline of every event in this case. Also provides additional readings in legal issues.

    Source of info (Hospice Foundationof Americe)

    HFA End-Of-Life Info - Terri Schiavo

    NOTE: I got a kick out of reading "an excellent timeline of every event."

     

     

     



    Written by justice1949 Blog about this entry
    This entry has 2 comments: (Add your own)
    • #2 Comment from justice1949Entry Author 
      9/22/06 6:12 PM Permalink
      The only reason nothing has been done ,as far as 'contempt', is because the American public never got the info from the media who never got the info to begin with....... To my knowledge Greer never signed any thing pretaining to the order he gave over the phone. I guess he thought no one would ever know........
    • #1 Comment from petnurser 
      9/22/06 5:11 PM Permalink
      Why weren't the lot of them charged with Contempt of Congress? They all blatently defied Congress and got away with it!!! WHY?????