Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Tales & Tails of New York

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< (A Book as Thick
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Ideas, Anyone? &n >
Friday, May 9, 2008
May 2008
Thursday, May 8, 2008
9:37:00 AM EDT

Diapers, Anyone? (Reply)


 
 
 
(Picture Above:  "Nana" -- Throwaway Mama Pitbull -- one of too, too many coming into our shelters.  Some people apparently can't figure that when you put two unneutered dogs together of opposite sex, they have babies!   What to do when the "Bitch keeps getting pregant?"  You dump the Moms at the pound and say they are "strays!")  
 
CDonian Writes:  Because it's damned scary to see the Q&As/comments on some dog/animal sites -- things in the general vein of:
"Is it OK if my dog goes outside only on Saturdays?"
"Why isn't my TrendyTinyTeacup PitPoo housetrained yet? I've had her for three days."
"My poodle is nine months old. When should he be groomed?"
"Can I use a suitcase as a dog carrier?" (!)
Plus the morons who refuse to have their dogs vaccinated; claim that spaying/neutering "cause" cancer; want to raise their dogs as Orthodox Vegans; scrub tear-stains with clorox or hair bleach; regard leash-laws as blatant Stalinism; or barely see the dog -- since Spot spends 70 hrs/week in day care or home alone, and is walked only by paid walkers.
 
Reply:   You know, in one way or another, I have (tragically) heard all of these -- and more -- over the years.
 
What about those people who don't figure out that when you put two unneutered dogs (or cats) together, they have BABIES!
 
Just last week a woman called seeking to give up her unneutered Cocker Spaniel because he kept trying to "get" to her unspayed poodle in heat.  She already had a litter of 6-month-old puppies from these two dogs, but swore to me she "could not afford" to neuter either of the adult dogs.
 
What about the people who decide to play "doctor" at home with their pets? --  Like the ignoramouses who abandoned 4 cats in a cardboard box outside Petco where we were doing cat adoptions ten years ago.   Inside the box containing the 4 six-month-old very sickly cats was a note written in broken English:
 
"The cats have fleas.....We treat with RAID."
 
Imagine using RAID to treat cats for fleas!!
 
Despite rushing all 4 cats to the vet, two of them subsequently died from poisining and the other two suffered permanent neurological damage.
 
This, by the way, is one reason we no longer do cat adoptions out of stores.
 
Too many people abused our service by finding clever and unique ways of dumping cats on us.
 
They sometimes left cats in our cages before we got to the store.  (We had to put locks on empty cages).  They sometimes left cats in boxes or carriers in the middle of an isle and walked out.  One clever person requested one of my volunteers to "watch" her cat (in a carrier) while she shopped.  Of course the woman never came back.  Another woman dropped off two older cats to one of the stores we worked in, telling the clerk she had been "fostering the cats" for me!  When I got to the store, Melissa told me, "One of your fosters just dropped off two cats a half hour ago. They're in the back."  Of course, I had never seen the cats before.   And someone else left two cats in a box outside on the steps of a smaller store we worked in.  The store owner was greeted by the box on his steps when he opened the store (One reason why pet supply store owners often give up the idea of doing adoptions out of stores).
 
Except for the people who left the note about using RAID on the cats, NONE of the others even bothered to write a note!   As horrible as it was to deal with the poisoned cats, we were nevertheless GRATEFUL to have the medical information on them.  Without that, all 4 cats would have died.  Who, after all, would attribute sickness in cats to someone using RAID on them?
 
As for the idiots who can't figure that a dog needs to be taken out more than once or twice a week, that is so common, I don't know that it needs further elaboration as I've written of it so many times here. 
 
One simply wonders if these people, themselves wear diapers? -- PCA


Written by mandy787 Blog about this entry
This entry has 5 comments: (Add your own)
  • #5 Comment from jmuhjacat
    5/8/08 5:39 PM | Permalink
    Feeling extremely angry after (re-)reading about the "Raid" incident, I once again find myself shaking my head in incomprehensible disbelief at the abject and moronic stupidity of people.  What has happened, that the educational system of the self-professed richest and "best" nation on earth no longer teaches these very basic-basic things?  

    It's getting harder even to find someone who uses correct grammar and who knows how to spell.  

    Really, I'm at a loss.
  • #4 Comment from ubermom1111
    5/8/08 5:36 PM | Permalink
    Animals suffer when parents "give" Junior a pet and expect that Junior will have an automatic sense of responsiblity.  If an animal is brought into the home for a child of any age - including teenagers, the parents are morally obligated to make sure the animal is cared for - whether it's a goldfish, cat, dog or shetland pony.  To give a child a pet and then walk away is dooming the pet to a miserable life. Of course some children are exceptions. However, most children, after falling in love with the cute kitten or puppy become bored with it. Changing a litter box is too icky. Grooming a dog is too hard. Training the new puppy is too tedious.
    So,  many animals end up discarded - like old toys.  
    Except animals are not toys. They are living beings.
    If only the people who bring the Fluffies and Fido's into their home would teach their children and themselves that this is a 12 year or more committment, that animals, like children, require constant care - both emotional and physical.
    However, somehow even parenting of children seems to have fallen by the wayside.  How can we expect current society to care for the animals, when it falls so short of caring for its children?
  • #3 Comment from cdonian
    5/8/08 3:25 PM | Permalink
    PS -- I'm scared witless by the number of people who try to avoid vet costs via home remedies and Internet-sold snake-oil (as if the dog were a science project) ... or who assume that any problem will just "blow over" ... or who try to solve emergencies via posting on chatboards -- like, "My dog has been vomiting for three days and isn't moving and won't drink water. What should I do?" or "Is it OK if my dog ate some Combat discs but isn't sick yet?"
    Yet many of the same people will overspend on designer dogwear and costumery, because it's All About Them, not about the dog.
  • #2 Comment from cdonian
    5/8/08 3:10 PM | Permalink
    Every dog I've had since age 5 was a rescue, every one required spaying/neutering, and there was no excuse for it. My rules:
    -- I don't take on what I can't afford - in time or money. When I've been "between dogs" and hard-up, couldn't afford dog care, or worked extremely long hours, I didn't have dogs; I volunteered with rescues instead.
    -- When I _do_ have dogs: I usually have just one at a time -- because the dog inevitably is a special-needs dog and has been grossly neglected. I know upfront that I'll be paying for spay/neuter, dental care, extra vet and specialist visits, meds, grooming, and "props" to make life easier - in addition to normal costs.
    I don't fling money to the winds, and have taken a Red Cross dog/cat first aid class to deal w/ emergencies. But I know when something is beyond me, and I will _not_ scrimp on a dog's basic care; I'll cut my personal extras instead.
    -- It's a lifetime deal.
    All of my dogs have been mid/late-life adoptees who lived almost forever. (Some of them came with legit, non-anecdotal documentation, so I know they lived to be 18+. And one thrown-away newborn puppy lived to age 21.)
    If a landlord won't take dogs, I don't move there. If a dog can't travel, I "vacation" locally. Yet I'm a perfectly well-rounded, normal, active person: I don't hoard animals, or just huddle at home among bags of kibble, cursing the human race.
    -- I _pay attention_ to the dogs, and try to make their lives interesting ... just as I would with people. Without that, deaf/blind and older dogs can resign themselves to becoming potted plants.
    No one told me to do these things. My parents didn't give me Dog Lessons, and weren't even really "animal people." But they were consistently decent, and  extended their decent behavior/values to animals. We didn't cut corners, neglect or discard anyone due to "inconvenience" -- whether it was my grandmother or our old dog. _Everyone_ was part of the Family Deal.
  • #1 Comment from rdautumnsage
    5/8/08 9:53 AM | Permalink
    Thank you, thank you! for posting this entry. I live on a dead end road with 7lots of woods beside my property. I take in strays, get them fixed and rehome them out of my own pocket. I'm forever amazed how many home owners think they can just let the cats roam outside without being spayed or nuetered. I want to cry when I hear someone say I ended up with a male pet so I wouldn't have to worry about them. My reply usually goes something like "What? you don't feel responsible for your male cat populating the neighborhood with stray throw aways?" Usually the response comes back it's not their problem. Like hell it isn't. It's the responsibility of every pet owner to make sure your animal is spayed and nuetered.

    Currently I have 2 litters of kittens from strays I wasn't able to get to before they became pregnant. Saturday one of the mother's is being spayed. Her kittens are going to another volunteer for fostering. I've taken care of these kittens during the first month and a half. Soon I'll deal with the other mother. 10 more kittens brought into the world because of someone's negligence. I so understand this entry. At the moment I financial strapped and still trying to do what I can to make a difference. Wish more people were as responsible as we are. (Hugs) Indigo
    http://journals.aol.com/rdautumnsage/ravens-lament/