Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

A different kind of Conservative Blog

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< No liberal bias i
Monday, January 10, 2005
The evolution of  >
Monday, January 17, 2005
January 2005
Friday, January 14, 2005
1:58:00 PM PST

Bush learns from mistakes


When Bush said, "bring em on" and when Bush said he wanted Osama Bin Ladin "Dead or Alive".  I had no problem with these statements - I liked them, but in the world of politics, mere words can have unintended consequences.  Bush learns from his mistakes as related in the following story AOL News - President Has Second Thoughts About 'Bring 'Em On'.  Can you imagine Clinton ever admitting to his mistakes like his failure to recognize Al-Queda for what it is.

Written by mark24609 Blog about this entry
This entry has 5 comments: (Add your own)
  • #5 Comment from lily990016 
    1/20/05 2:50 PM Permalink
    Clinton couldn't even admit to smoking that joint.

    And he still hasn't admitted that had he reacted at all after the first WTC bombing, that there's a good possibility that Osama would be dead and 9/11 wouldn't have happened at all. I mean we had Osama right between the sights repeatedly.

    Anyone who thinks the terrorists plotted that attack in the 9 months that Bush was president needs a neurological examination. So why blame him for it. I watched it on t.v. and still, to this day cannot believe what happened. Nor am able to concieve that using planes as bombs was even an option. I'm semi-normal and terrorists are not, you can not know exactly what they are going to do.
    ~J
    http://journals.aol.com/lily990016/Pissoffliberals/
  • #4 Comment from republicanjen 
    1/18/05 8:14 AM Permalink
    I'm still saying 'bring 'em on'  Then, the military can oblige those with death wishes.
  • #3 Comment from purcellneil 
    1/17/05 6:11 PM Permalink
    I was with him on "Osama - Dead or Alive", though I have to say he dropped that one pretty quick.  If he didn't mean it, I wish he had not said it.  Seems he wasn't serious about that one.

    For someone who avoided combat duty in Vietnam, I thought the "Bring 'em on" quote was ridiculous.  Here he is safe at home daring people to attack our Troops.  I think that was regrettable, and a bit offensive.

    As for Bill Clinton, you're off the mark.

    He was wrong about Rwanda and said so.  He admitted that mistake.  He eventually admitted to cheating on his wife too, although I know few men who would have rushed to offer that bit of truth unless forced to do it.

    He admitted that he lied about sex, but your guy lied in order to take us into war (and still hasn't admitted it).  

    As for Al Qaeda, you overstate the case against Clinton.  While neither he nor Bush can fairly be blamed for 9/11, it is clear that Clinton was very much aware of the threat of terrorism and spoke frequently about the problem, describing it as a new and major threat.  He stepped up our counter-terrorism efforts and when his administration handed-off to the incoming Bush team, they made it clear that this would be the major issue in the years to come.  All of this was related in the 9/11 Commission report and in Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies".  

    In any case, blaming the old guy is a strategy you can use in the first months after you take on a new job, but if you are still talking about your predecessor after four years, it is pathetic.

    Neil
  • #2 Comment from candles102 
    1/16/05 6:09 PM Permalink
    Clinton would never admit that he was wrong.  You see the difference between George W. Bush and Bill Clinton is that Bush has something called class and a humble heart!
    ~Sarah Flansburg
    http://journals.aol.com/candles102/SarahFlansburgsPoliticalJournal
  • #1 Comment from ibspiccoli4life 
    1/15/05 2:22 PM Permalink
    Mark,

    The 'Bring 'em On' quote was the one that bothered me the most.  I had a dear friend in Mosul, Iraq at the time and I thought the last thing we need is the president egging these people on.  So it was nice to hear him reflect on these statements and maybe learn a little from those mistakes.  

    What I don't get, though, is why the constant refrences to Bill Clinton?  I see this time and time again on conservative blogs.  I was just as critical of Bill Clinton as I am of George Bush, but Clinton isn't president anymore.  

    dave,
    http://journals.aol.com/ibspiccoli4life/RandomThoughtsfromaProgressiveMi