Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

WeLoveMountains

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Former Massey Wor
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Gas Well Drilling >
Thursday, November 1, 2007
October 2007
Where Does The Scrubber Waste Go?
Former Massey Worker Speaks
Maria Gunnoe Threatened
He Speaks Of The Lorax
Studs Terkel
SBZ Rule
« October 2007 Archive
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
12:36:00 PM EDT

Where Does The Scrubber Waste Go?


 
 

From: Vivian Stockman [mailto:vivian@ohvec.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 11:19 AM
To: a bunch of folks
Subject: AEP settlement will eventually lead to cleaner air -- but where will the scrubber waste go?

When I was teaching at Duval High School in Lincoln County a student brought me a white substance that had been spread on the dirt road that went by his home. I had him analyze it and he found that it contained Calcium and Sulfate ions. Calcium Sulfate is a by-product from power plant scrubbers. It is commonly known as gypsum which is in sheetrock. I figure it came from the John Amos power plant scrubbers. The gypsum itself, although out of place on a country road draining into creeks, is not very toxic. However all kinds of toxic chemicals come from burning coal and I suspect mercury and others were also trapped in the gypsum.
 
http://southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2007/10/aep-settlement-will-eventually-lead-to.asp
 
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
AEP settlement will eventually lead to cleaner air -- but where will the scrubber waste go?
Yesterday the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced a record $4.6 billion settlement with American Electric Power in a lawsuit brought by eight northeastern states and a number of environmentaladvocacy groups. The Ohio-based company also agreed to install pollution controls in order to reduce air pollution coming from its facilities, including coal-burning plants in Virginia, West Virginia and Kentucky.

"Less air pollution from power plants means fewer cases of asthma and other respiratory illnesses," said Granta Nakayama, assistant administrator for EPA’s enforcement and compliance assurance program.

It's true that the settlement reached with the company will allow millions of people to breathe cleaner air. But it also raises a question: What will the company do with the additional coal combustion waste collected after installing more effective emissions controls?

The EPA currently does not regulate coal combustion waste as hazardous waste, and this lack of regulation is creating serious environmental problems. Across the South and the nation, coal combustion waste landfills and surface impoundments have released to the environmental toxic chemicals and metals including arsenic, lead and cadmium at levels dangerous to human health. At least 23 states including Texas, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina have poisoned surface or groundwater supplies from the improper disposal of coal ash. As we reported last month, the agency recently released a draft risk assessment on coal combustion waste disposal that found unlined coal ash waste ponds pose a cancer risk 900 times above what the government considers acceptable.

Environmental advocacy groups have been urging EPA to begin regulating coal combustion waste as hazardous waste, and the agency is now accepting public comments on the matter. The AEP settlement and the additional waste the company's cleanup efforts will create highlight the importance of addressing this environmental hazard soon.

 



Written by martinjul Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)