Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Wal-Mart Competition

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Wal-Mart Stock
Saturday, October 15, 2005
I Love Wal-Mart >
Sunday, October 16, 2005
October 2005
10 Rules of Sam Walton
Wal-Mart Supports Schwarzenegger
Wal-Mart seeks image boost
Wal-Mart Critics Take Cause to Church
Wal-Mart Film
Wal-Mart Banking
Wal-Mart Urgent Care
Wal-Mart Environmental Impact
Wal-Mart Supercenters
Wal-Mart New Stores
Wal-Mart Benefits
Wal-Mart Doctor
General Session Speaker
Wal-Mart Chic
Wal-Mart Packaging
Wal-Mart Heiress
Wal-Mart Minority Business
Wal-Mart Jobs
Wal-Mart to open second experimental store
Wal-Mart Manufacturers Find Little ROI In RFID
Sam Walton Legacy
I Hate Wal-Mart
I Love Wal-Mart
CASPIAN vs Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart Stock
Wal-Mart vs Tom Coughlin
Wal-Mart Fashion
Wal-Mart Unionization
Wal-Mart Rural America
Wal-Mart RFID
Wal-Mart Protest
Wal-Mart Communications
YEO Speaker
MPI Speaker
China Competition Speaker
Customer Service Speaker
Sales Speaker
DECA Speaker
SIFE Speaker
YPO Speaker
Sam's Club Expert
Wal-Mart Expert
International Speaker
Conference Speaker
American Speaker
Association Speaker
Rotary Speaker
Rotary International Speaker
Chamber of Commerce Speaker
Wal-Mart Kill Zone
Wal-Mart New York
Wal-Mart Janitors
Feds Can Learn From Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart Sales
Wal-Mart Nicaragua
Wal-Mart Costa Rica
Wal-Mart Honduras
Wal-Mart Guatemala
Wal-Mart El Salvador
Wal-Mart Central America
Wal-Mart World
Wal-Mart Fashion
Wal-Mart Bank
Wal-Mart Turkey
International Speaker
Wal-Mart Interview
Wal-Mart Trucking Official Receives ATA Honor
Motivational Speaker
Inspirational Speaker
Turnaround Team
Turnaround Expert
Turnaround Specialist
Business Turnaround
New York City Law Targets Wal-Mart
Judge Hears From Former Wal-Mart Executive
Speaker Bureaus
Bergdahl Book Tranlated into Korean, Chinese, Thai
Union Network Targets Korea’s Wal-Mart Branches
Jim Walton Appointed to the Board of Directors of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
JAPAN/USA: Wal-Mart ups Seiyu stake, shuffles execs
Univ. of Pittsburgh Kicks Off RFID Center
Wal-Mart sees same-store sales up
« October 2005 Archive
Sunday, October 16, 2005
7:35:00 AM EDT

CASPIAN vs Wal-Mart


CASPIAN is an Acronyn - Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering 

What is RFID? An overview from CASPIAN's Spychips website Spychips
Wednesday, October 12, 2005

RFID stands for Radio Frequency IDentification, a technology that uses tiny computer chips smaller than a grain of sand to track items at a distance. RFID "spy chips" have been hidden in the packaging of Gillette razor products and in other products you might buy at a local Wal-Mart, Target, or Tesco - and they are already being used to spy on people.

Each tiny chip is hooked up to an antenna that picks up electromagnetic energy beamed at it from a reader device. When it picks up the energy, the chip sends back its unique identification number to the reader device, allowing the item to be remotely indentified. Spy chips can beam back information anywhere from a couple of inches to up to 20 or 30 feet away.

Some of the world's largest product manufacturers have been plotting behind closed doors since 1999 to develop and commercialize this technology. If they are not opposed, their plan is use these remote-readable spychips to replace the bar code.

RFID tags are NOT an "improved bar code" as the proponents of the technology would like you to believe. RFID technology differs from bar codes in three important ways:

1. With today's bar code technology, every can of Coke has the same UPC or bar code number as every other can (a can of Coke in Toronto has the same number as a can of Coke in Topeka). With RFID, each individual can of Coke would have a unique ID number which could be linked to the person buying it when they scan a credit card or a frequent shopper card (i.e., an "item registration system").

2. Unlike a bar code, these chips can be read from a distance, right through your clothes, wallet, backpack or purse -- without your knowledge or consent -- by anybody with the right reader device. In a way, it gives strangers X-ray vision powers to spy on you, to identify both you and the things you're wearing and carrying.

3. Unlike the bar code, RFID could be bad for your health. RFID supporters envision a world where RFID reader devices are everywhere - in stores, in floors, in doorways, on airplanes -- even in the refrigerators and medicine cabinets of our own homes. In such a world, we and our children would be continually bombarded with electromagnetic energy. Researchers do not know the long-term health effects of chronic exposure to the energy emitted by these reader devices.

Many huge corporations, including Philip Morris, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart, have begun experimenting with RFID spy chip technology. Gillette is leading the pack, and recently placed an order for up to 500 million RFID tags from a company called "Alien Technology" (we kid you not). These big companies envision a day when every single product on the face of the planet is cataloged and tracked with RFID spychips!

As consumers we have no way of knowing which packages contain these chips. While some chips are visible inside a package (see our pictures of Gillette spy chips), RFID chips can be well hidden. For example they can be sewn into the seams of clothes, sandwiched between layers of cardboard, molded into plastic or rubber, and integrated into consumer package design.

This technology is rapidly evolving and becoming more sophisticated. RFID spychips can even be printed, meaning the dot on a printed letter "i" could be used to track you. In addition, the tell-tale copper antennas commonly seen attached to RFID chips can now be printed with conductive ink, making them nearly imperceptible. Companies are even experimenting with making the product packages themselves serve as antennas.

As you can see, it could soon be virtually impossible for a consumer to know whether a product or package contains an RFID spychip. For this reason, CASPIAN (the creator of this web site) is proposing federal labeling legislation, the RFID Right to Know Act, which would require complete disclosures on any consumer products containing RFID devices.

We believe the public has an absolute right to know when they are interacting with technology that could affect their health and privacy.

Don't you?

Join us. Let's fight back before big corporations track our every move.

For information on Wal-Mart Competition go to:  www.michaelbergdahl.net

 



Written by mbergdahl Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: (Add your own)