Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

RULE 53 REFORM, BLAWG, LAW, OAR, ORS, LEGAL WAR, FAMILY, CPS, PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAINGN TOPIC,

Public Journal
Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
   
Friday, October 19, 2007
2:06:46 PM EDT

POWER & PREJUDICE to go with CONTENT OR PREJUDICE


 
                                           http://technorati.com/claim/h59r55n8dt
 
REFORMCPS (Marilyn LeBaron) REFORMCPS's photo
Joined on Oct 17, 2007

CPS does not have a legal right to conduct an investigation of alleged child abuse or neglect in a private home without your consent. Removing a child from your home without your consent even for several hours is a “seizure” under federal law.

Posted: 6/18/2008 at 22:55  | Leave Comment 
POWER & PREJUDICE to go with CONTENT OR PREJUDICE

Reply | 6/19/2008 1:12:34 AM
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&pop=1&ping=1
Reply | 6/19/2008 1:14:07 AM
Side note 1)… à when I am kept from a jury & competency is mute! (Prejudice)… go to side note, point 2)… à Horner… They accepted a plea before they asked fro a competency evaluation… go to side note, point 3) à But, Miller said, on 01-25-05, 'No', to my question, 'Do you need to have me evaluated'. This cannot be a competency issue! … Go to an unnumbered side comment) à Miller had by way of, 'No', already established the competency to stand trial issue… DHS cannot have that call…
Reply | 6/19/2008 1:15:26 AM
7. I have been punished and the 'ADJUDICATION' date, 01-25-05, will not get a formal 'ORDER', till 'We the DHS' actually take you to court, while a Judge remains the complainant on the matter for us, holding that base, where there is no Due Process protection over the rights on a parenting issue. Horner's, 'You go first' decision, then, 'Off with your head' until I hear form your future intended opponent. Now because Horner disagreed with my interpretation of the issues no one will defend directly, which have a Constitutional interpretation of Equal Protection of the Law, based on the Due Process rights of a criminal (If I had a plea)…,
Reply | 6/19/2008 1:15:46 AM
  Roger 
70 years old
Male
Portland, OR
Hometown: Portland


Last Login: 6/18/2008

"We cannot have Constitutional Government, without Constitutional Courts �Roger Weidner "
View My: Blog | Pictures | Videos | Layouts
  SUBSCRIBE
  USER OPTIONS
  BLOG ARCHIVES
2008
June 
2007
November 

RULE 53 REFORM

This is Child Protection? 

The New American Request a sample issue of The New American magazine.
That Freedom Shall Not Perish. www.jbs.org/node/4632



Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 10 comments: Show Recent | Add your own

Monday, October 15, 2007
4:32:18 PM EDT

VETERAN COURT WATCHERS


             VETERAN COURT WATCHERS

 

                       CALL TO ACTION

http://www.veterancourtwatchers.com/index.htm 

    

 

A former attorney, and public prosecutor from Portland Oregon, Roger Weidner, and a few American Veterans in Chicago, Illinois, issues this CALL TO ACTION for all American Veterans nationwide, to serve in support as Court Watchers, as we restore courts of constitutional “due process” where truth and justice once again protects the innocent and punishes the corrupt. 

 

 

WHY VETERAN COURT WATCHERS? 

 

Mr. Roger Weidner, (rogerweidner.com) is the impetus behind this effort, and therefore the resident expert.  Veteran Court Watchers are needed to assist Mr. Weidner, and to be taught to duplicate the process.  Precious little time is available to convert non-believers.  I call your attention to the CALL TO ACTION where is stated: "All personal agendas not consistent with this effort must be checked at the door."

 

To register as a Veteran Court Watcher contact:

http://www.chicagoshowbiz.com  & www.veterancourtwatchers.com



Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:07:13 AM EDT

http://technorati.com/account/blogs/blogclaim.html


http://technorati.com/account/blogs/blogclaim.html

MADatCPS (Marilyn LeBaron)   MADatCPS's photo                           

RULE 53 REFORM. Judges should not have the automatic motion to consolidatde ' partially ' only in the direction that gives the prosecutor the advantage. That is a pre-set disposition.

Technorati

Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

Sunday, October 14, 2007
4:20:12 AM EDT

Evil is just that. Evil.


Cristy,

The Termination of Parental rights is the equvalent of the Death Penalty.

 

Does anybody deserver to be put to death here?

 

Not according to justice!

Don't pretend to understand or try.

Evil is just that.

UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron



From: Christy Curry "christycur@hotmail.com"

To: Mad at CPS "reformcps@aol.com"

Sent: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:26 pm

Subject: RE: Lawful Revocation of Power of Attorney

 To make along story i'll state the basic's on 10-28-05 a social worker came to
 
my daughter's shcool to investagate a bruise on her bottom saller than a fifty
 
cent piece, she took digital picture of her bottom. this photo was enhaned and
 
enlarged, now thier claiming she had a bruise 4 by4 inches. they said they removed
 
all of my children because of refusal to sign her plan. the department does not care
 
that my older daughter who was 9 at the time smothered her 4 month old brother.
 
on 11-1-05 the judge returned the baby home because he was breastfeed but nobody
 
said anything about the 2 year old who was also breastfeeding she was returned on
 
2-15-07 my termination pretrial for my now 11 year old daughter is 11-6-07 and fact
 
finding is set for11-20-07, three days after my daughter turns 12. my boyfriend 3
 
months later was served a notice that he was going to be tried for assault of aminor
 
in the thrid degree in may of 2006 hewas charged with subsatial disfigirement, assault
 
of a minor in the thrid degree. this charge is waiting to be seen in the supreme court.
 
becuase he is not the bio father of my daughter cps says he has no right to spank her
 
and because i told him to spank her their saying i failed to protect her. nobdy knows
 
where to locate her father. the thing that gets me is they never took my daughter to the
 
emergency room, doctor or even have the shcool nurse look at her, instead they fax a
 
digital photo to their doctor in whitch has given proffesional testimony in criminal court
 
and civil court on the servarity of a bruise he never seen. i know this dose not make a
 
whole lot of sense my phone number is (360)2920209 thank you any help would be
 
greatfully accepted.
 
christy


Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:19:40 AM EDT


To: "christycur@hotmail.com"

Subject: Lawful Revocation of Power of Attorney
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:11:42 -0400

From: reformcps@aol.com

Dear Christy,

I am in Oregon. We will help. Tell us when your court date is and I will alert all the people

interested in CPS REFORM. I don't see how they can take one and not take them all.

If you are unfit then you should not be around any of your kids. I don't agree with them.

The fact that they are not taking your other kids speaks volumes!

Here is the CPS ( free ) HANDBOOK. It is useful. It is based on law outside your Adhesion

Contract, 'Driver's Licence', that gives them the 'Authority' to assess. Real Estate Property

is assessed ya see the relevancy in the use of the term 'property' as it has bearing on the

use of the term 'assess'.

I don't like it. If they are not 'Formally Charging' you with a crime that is worthy of the

'Death Penalty' then they should not 'put you to death' ( Terminate your Parental Rights ).

They should not 'put your children to death' meaning everybody is going to be broken away

from each other. I mean a death penalty to you is the same as the death penalty to

everybody. But, I don't know who else has interest in custody.

Are they giving your child to the other parent or up for adoption, like an infant? How old is

the one they are preventing your relationship with.

This is a document that is in the language of a natural man. Unlike, 'a Person', as in the

terminology of the Department of Motor Vehicles, Individual, like they see your kids, which

has already claimed all Children as Property.

All this language bellow is written from the laws outside the 'Adhesion Contract', ODL,

which Child Protective Services are omitting in their exchanges with you. Don't sign

anything they put in front of you, especially if it had he words, Use, Information, Release,

those are persecutory and are 'Confession'. ( Agreements with them means they Presume

and you validate their presumption on a *Transaction*, ( anything you sign ). Send a letter

to Revoke your signature and say, I did not understand Information, Use, and Release was

a persecutory instrument against my innocence. I was ill advised.

Edit this ( but not too much ). Of course you know we are not in the State of Arizona, IN

THE JUSTICE COURT, FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, that this is not about a Traffic

Citation, and your name is not Joe Patriot, or Janet Mary, Wallenand so forth.

Fill it out and Send it to them ( every one of them ). Put your kids names in there, too and

weather other parent is or is not your opponent they should sign, too. That way everybody is

on the same side. But, if the other parent is the opponent you can have your own agreement

regarding Physical, & Legal Custody, this is handling the Legal part lorded over by the

Court.

By the way Person of Unsound Mind ( Ward of the Court ) is what having a Court Appointed

lawyer indicates.

I am also sending in a separate email the CPS ( free ) HANDBOOK

UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron

Please make sure and get some Advise from a Constitutional 'lawyer' and stay away from

attorneys.



Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:18:48 AM EDT

 

Joe Patriot, In Propria Persona
Arizona state Citizen
c/o General Delivery
Amado, Arizona state
zip code exempt
 
In Propria Persona
By Special Visitation
 
                      IN THE JUSTICE COURT
 
                     FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
 
 
STATE OF ARIZONA,            )       Case No. 96-CR-19-MI
                             )
     Plaintiff in Admiralty  )       NOTICE AND REVOCATION
                             )
     v.                      )       OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
                             )
Janet Mary, Wallen,          )
                             )
     Defendant at Law        )
_____________________________)
 
 
COMES NOW Janet Mary, Wallen, In Propria Persona, the Accused
in the above entitled action, to provide Notice to all interested
parties of Her lawful Revocation of Power of Attorney, to wit:
 
     KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Joe Patriot,
In Propria Persona, BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, deposes and says that:
 
     I, Joe Patriot, In Propria Persona, as a lawful American
Citizen of  the several states, do hereby wholly REVOKE, CANCEL, and
ANNUL all Powers of Attorney, expressed, implied in fact Or otherwise,
signed  or otherwise consented to by Me, My agent(s),parents, parens
patriae, implied in law or by trust, voluntary or involuntary, with or
without My informed consent and knowledge, as these revoked Powers of
Attorney pertain to Me, and to the property both real and personal,
obtained by Me in the past, present, and future.
 
          Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney:
                          
Page 1 of 4 


Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:18:13 AM EDT

Evil is just that. Evil.





Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:17:24 AM EDT

Evil is just that. Evil.





Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

4:12:22 AM EDT

Cristy,Evil is just that. Evil.


<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
 

     Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1746(1) and  
executed "without the United States," I do hereby affirm, under  
penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America and   
under the laws of the Arizona Republic, that the foregoing is true and   
correct, to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief.
 
     And Further deponent saith not. 
     I now affix My signature and official seal to all of the 
above affirmations WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL OF MY 
UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF THOSE RIGHTS, 
PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 1-207 AND 1-103.6. 
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
/s/ Joe Patriot
________________________________________________________________
Citizen/Principal, by Special Visitation, In Propria Persona,
proceeding un-represented, with Assistance, Special 
Sworn, subscribed, sealed, and affirmed before me this
 
_____________ day of ____________________________, 1996.
 
 
________________________________________________________________
Notary Public for the state of Arizona
 
My commission expires on
 
________________________________________
 
 
          Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney:
                          Page 4 of 4
 
_______________________________________
Notary Public for the state of Arizona 
My commission expires on __________________ 
 
 
          Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney:
                          Page 4 of 4

Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!



Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own

Tuesday, October 9, 2007
4:13:12 AM EDT

I think we all should pay attention.


From: Mad at CPS <reformcps@aol.com>
Subject: I think we all should pay attention.


I think we all should pay attention.

I have not seen my mom in almost three years and the DHS never presented a case against my mother.

In opposite of the rule, Burden of Proof in on the Court, the DHS said, "There are indications of child abuse or neglect but no reasonable cause to believe child abuse or neglect has occurred", which is the definition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE. That disposition was assigned the case and a completed assessment filed prior to the face-to-face with me when there were no supervisory extensions filed to allow further time, which made that face-to-face illegal.

A fax was sent to my dad after an illegal assessment that was not accompanied by a sound police investigation. After that the caseworker lied and then said, "Major Safety Threat" when the report was not responded to and she also said, "We don't need police involvement".


When a judge can call you a criminal for not putting up with illegal activity, it is time for change.

When the cops can threaten to kick down your door just to make you sign a release of information, it is time for Change.

When DHS Agents lie and you don't get to complain, it is time for change.

When the right to privacy is used to say you do not get to face your accuser, it is time for change.

Contact Mat at CPS ( madatcps@aol.com ) for a copy of the CPS (free) Handbook.

UCC 1-308
Marilyn LeBaron



Written by reformcps Permalink | Blog about this entry
This entry has 0 comments: Add your own