The Maverick Conservative

Remember that young girl (eskimo?) who Democrats in Congress brought in to testify, CRYING, about the destruction of the traditional arctic way of life because of GLOBAL WARMING?  Well, we know that was a CROCK to start with.  An 18 year old girl could NEVER be an EXPERT on changes in climate in the arctic.  She could not even be an EXPERT on changes in poeple's way of life.  She has not been on this Earth long enough.  She was not PRESENT for the "old" way of life.  It was always clear that the whole thing was a STUNT by which Democrats were again HIDING behind CHILDREN to try to immunize themselves from criicism.  Sorry, to me (60), an 18 year old is a CHILD.  Further, her age was clearly the main reason she was chosen to be part of the Democratic SCAM.

Do you doubt me (you FOOL you!!!!).   Today, NASA came out with the results of a NASA stury of arctic climate changes.   Their conclusion was the same as other experts who have looked at this.  There is a NATURAL CYCLE int arctic temperatures caused by ocean currents.  That cycle has existed long before "gobal warming" theory.  It results in periodic MELTING of arctic ice, and warming in the arctic.  NASA concluded, correctly, that this has nothing to do with "global warming".

Ok.  We know that Democrats in Congress, and Al Gore, are intellectual sleazeballs and deceivers.  So this should not surprise you in terms of lthe Democratic SCAM in trying to use a CHILD (young woman) to sell a Democratic LIE.

However, there is a bigger question here.  Do advocates of "global warming" CARE about the facts?  It is not just politicians who have scammed on this.  Remember all of those people crying about the poor polar bears (it tuurns out that the poor polar bears dying was another SCAM, as the pictures of dying polar bears were the result of a BAD STORM).  And the mainstream media has slavishly "reported" every scam as reality, and then downplayed the TRUTH, when the truth comes out.  You can expect the same with this NASA report (I saw it reported on Brit Hume's show--Brit Hume being the best news anchor in all of television right now).   This latest report is, I should emphasize, an OFFICIAL NASA report, and NOT a creation of Fox News.

Back to the main question here:  NO, "global warming" fanatics do NOT care about the real reasons behind arctic warming.  They will repeat the same false allegations tomorrow as if this report did not exist.  That is because "global warming" is a RELIGION.  It is NOT "science".  Any facts that go against the religion are IGNORED.  That is perfectly understandable as to the great religions of the world.  They have a complete system of belief relying on faith, where the details are really not that important.  But "globbal warming" supposedly ARISES out of science.   There is no excuse for claiming "science" as your god, wile really proposing an INFERIOR (to the great religions) religious FAITH.

"Glboal warming" really does rely entirely on faith.  The response to every challenge is not to debate the facts (Gore actually says that journalists should NOT consider the "oterh side"), but to cry HERESY. 

The emperor has not clothes.  "Global warming" is NOT science (regardless of whether there is SOME warming caused by man's activities).  It is a RELIGION, and its entire way of approaching "facts" and "argument" is that of a RELIGION. 

That is nowhere better illustrated as on this arctic warming scam, although it has been illustrated over and over again on similar scams (see the earlier entry on the NINE errors the British courts found in Al Gore's movie, for example). 

This is why the founder of The Weather Channel, John Coleman, has come out against the "global warming" scam.

Again, the true facts do not matter to "global warming" adherents, because theirs is a HOLY cause based on faith (Al Gore--I don't make these things up--has called it a moral and SPIRITUAL issue).   That is why you can't believe ANY of this "global warming" stuff.  Scientists are intimidate, lest they be accused of heresy and (figuratively) burned at the stake.  So there is no way of judging if ANY of this stuff is true.

What we KNOW is that the Earth, like the arctic, has WARMED much MORE in the past--all without man.  So the heavy burder of proof is on "global warming" adherents to support a COHERENT theory that PREDICTS, based on FACTS.  They have failed to do so to this point.

Nope.  The vague idea that the Earth is "warming", and that man may be contributing SOME (who knows how much) to that warmin, does NOT represent a coherent or useful scientific theory.

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this