The Maverick Conservative

Yes, the Republican debate confirmed once again that CNN is a biased, evil network that no one should ever watch.  "Exposed" is an overstatement in the headling, since CNN exposed itself long ago as a network uninterested in facts and totally interested in agenda.  I quit even surfing CNN long ago, and only watched part of the CNN debate to see where a few of the Republican candidates were headed (in terms of issues).

It turns out that the "gay questioner" FEATURED by Anderson Cooper works for the Hillary Clinton campaign.  Does this constitute BOTH a Clinton dirty trick AND a CNN dirty trick?  Of course it does.  It turns out that CNN featured SEVERAL "questioners" that were connected with Democratic persons and/or organizations--not to mention that at least one of their supposedly "undecided" focus group was an EDWARDS supporter.

But did you really need the above infomratin to know that the CNN debate was a JOKE.  "What would Jesus have done?" (I can't make this up; this is one of the despicable questions chosen by Anderson Cooper and CNN, and Anderson Cooper--a typical lying, leftist, sanctimonious hypocrite--even had the nerve to chide a Republican candidate for not addressing the the questioners emphasis on what JESUS would have done).  Do Democrats get questions about the Bible (for example:  "What does the Bible say about homosexuals, and do you belive the Bible is WRONG?).  Of course not.  But Republicans were asked on CNN(again, ubelievably, with FOLLOW UP by Anderson Cooper), whether they actually believed EVERY WORD of the Bible. 

This was just a warm up for the Clinton News Network.  Imagine the Hillary Clinton reacton if a REPUBLICAN PLANT was featured as a questioner   You would be SATURATED with Clinton accusations, amplified by the mainstream media, that the Republican HATE MACHINE--dirty tricks machine--had targeted her unfairly.  In fact, Hillary Clinton reacted that way to a LEGITIMATE question as to whether she agreed with Spitzer's plan for driver's licenses for illegal immigrants (that is, Clinton reacted that way AFTER she botched the question)--a question from Tim Russert (manistream media reporter), and NOT from a Repblican PLANT (as one, and probably more, of teh questioners on CNN were Democratic PLANTS).

Again, though, you did not even have to know about the connection to the Clinton campaign to know where CNN was coming from.  CNN asked TWO gay questions--the one from the military retired general being a "gotcha" type question to Mitt Romney (to attempt to highlight an alleged "flip-flop" by Romney, which Anderson Cooper AGAIN tried to press home).  It was not mentioned, of course, that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy was a BILL CLINTON policy:  that is who signed it into law).

What happened after the Republicans answered the question about a military policy that is WORKING to avoid morale problems in the military (as Republicans correctly said).  Anderson Cooper personally introduced the retired general who asked the question (an ACTIVIST who had appeared on CN four years before urging the same position).  Then Anderson Cooper ASKED the retired general to debate the Republicans ("Did you get an answer to your--planted--question?").   The man was then allowed to make a SPEECH in support of his postiion--receiving  MORE air time than any of the candidates received to answer his "question" in the first place.

I could go on, but you get the picture.  CNN is clearly part of the "evil media", and there is no excuse for anyone to watch the network.  Republicans should NOT go on CNN for any reason, after this disgracefull performance.  Whether Repubican politicians have neough cojones to adopt this policy, it is the proper policy for "news" VIEWERS to adopt (boycotting CNN).  When a network does not even make a PRETENSE of fairnesss, it should pay the consequences (as CNN already has, since no one watches).

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this