The Maverick Conservative

In one of those stories with an agenda that permeate the New York Times, the totally despicable Associated Press, AND AOL, AOL is presently featuring an AP story about a New York Times Story (intellectual INCEST, anyone?) saying that 121 Iraq and Afghan war veterans have been involved in "killings".

It just does not get any more EVIL than this.  The story (to try to magnify the number) includes ALL kinds of "killings" (DRUNK DRIVING, drownings, stabbings, with guns, etc.).  Notice that it includes veterans from BOTH Iraq and Afghanistan (dirty little secret:  Lefitists, including those in the mainstream media, do NOT respect the troops in Afghanistan any more than they respect those in Iraq; nor do they really like the war in Afghanistan--the "good war"--any more than they like the War in Iraq).

How many ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS have been "involved in killings" in this country?  You will NOT find out from any MAJOR story in the New York Times, picked up by the despicable Associated Press, and featured on AOL. 

That is because the New York Times, the AP, and AOL SUPPORT illegal immigrants.  They do NOT "support our troops".  Despite the boilerplate denials, leftists and the mainstream media generally DESPISE our trooops; they do NOT support our troops. 

See my previous entry about Cambridge jumping on the Boy Scouts for donation boxes (near polling places) asking the public to "support our troops" with care packages.  To Cambridge, this was a POLITICAL STATEMENT.  A Harvard educated lawyer from Cambridge went on O'Reilly and defended Cambridge by saying the ctiy council was right:   that "supporting our troops" was BAD, because it supported the War in Iraq.

This story is meant to call our troops KILLERS.  Well, AOL, the AP, and the New York Tiimes may despise our troops.  I DESP:PISE AOL, the AP, the New York Times, leftists, and the rest of the mainstream media that think this way. 

This is NOT a "scientific" study of how to help combat veterans adjust back to civilian life.  Nope.  you are naive, bordering on terminally stupid, if you believe that this has anything to do with saying our troops need more "help".  How many World War II veterans have been "involved" in "killings"?  This is reminiscent of all of those stories about how dangerous Vietnam War veterans were.  It is CHARACTER ASSASSINATION of ourtroops, and attempted propaganda against BOTH the War in Iraq and the War in Afghanistan--NOT something intended to "help" our troops.

Young males, of course, are known to be involved in more "killings" than any other group, AND in drunken driving.  This story has no CONTEXT--no real reason to believe that combat veterans are any more "dangerous" than the ordinary young male--much less than military veterans who never were involved in combat. 

This story is DISGRACEFUL.  If I had not promised--in this blog--to stay with AOL until the last other person had left (so that someone is here to turn out the lights), I would leave AOL for this story alone.  YOU should leave AOL (hastening the time when I will be able to turn out the lights).  I KNOW that this is an AP story picking up a New York Times story.  But AOL is just as GUILLTY.  This is the type of anti-military story that AOL routinely features.

Have I held back too much again--failed to express my true feeligns about how DESPICABLE the mainstream media is?  I hope not.

How many "JOURNALISTS" have been involved in "killings"?  In quiring minds want to know.  Merely thinking that his is a useful story to investigate, or feature as "news", makes the mainstream media EVIL PEOPLE trying to make it HARDER for our troops.  I have no respect for these people (the mainstream media--not our troops, for which I have a lot of respect).

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this