8:55:00 AM EST
Natalee Holloway: The End?
This story is NOT important--merely showing again that the despicable Associated Press is despicable. How many MURDERS were there is this country (not to mention worldwide) yesterday? How many other deaths?
I think it is the appropriate way for the Natalee Holloway story to DIE (even though I recognize that the back fence gossip obsessed media will not stop bringing it up for some time yet). Today's WORLDWIDE AP/AOL story on the matter is a farce. Since the whole "news" coverage--not to mention Juhan van der Sloot--has been a farce over the past two years, it really would be fitting if the story ended this way (it will, for me, as this will be positively my last entry on a story where I have been consistently proven correct). Today's media exerixe in farce, substituting for worldwide news, is that Johan van der Sloot threw WINE (HORRORS!!!!--be thankful it was not water, or--so help me--there might have been references to WATERBOARDING) in the vace of a "critic" after van der Sloot (the idiot) made his suppsed LAST (pray for this) appearance on Dutch TV. Note that this occurred OFF CAMERA, after the TV show concluded, as van der Sloot evidently took exception to the comments of another "guest" on the TV program.
This incident says NOTHING about who killed Natalee Holloway (she is surely dead). I really wish this idiot would stop giving those other idiots ("journalists") an excuse to highlight the idiocy of them all. It did not even happen ON AIR (which would still have been unimportant, but slightly more understandable as a "news" story). Does this mean that every time van der Sloot throws water/wine/kool aid in the face of ANYBODY, it is WORLDWIDE "news". You just can't defend that.
Van der Sloot should SHUT UP. The media should SHUT UP. Unless there is really something important and new (this is NOT), this merely embarrasses everybody involved to no purpose.
As I have said for about a year and one half, in this blog, despite the 1367 (more than the number of days) "new developments" in the Natalee Holloway story (from the media HYPE point of view), there were ALWAYS only TWO possible "new" developments (after the first two months or so):
1. Natalee Holloway's body, or clear evidence indicating a body (blood stains, body part, etc.) is found.
2. Someone with direct knowledge of what happened CRACKS (either under interrogation or by spilling the beans in a way that comes to public light).
EVERYTHING else is, and was, unimportant. Oh, I guess if van der Sloot, or his co-suspects, KILLED someone else, it would be legitimate news. But wine in the face, off camera, hardly even rises to the status of back fence gossip (certainly outside of the place it occurred).
Written by skip3366 Blog about this entry