The Maverick Conservative

I posted the comments below under one on those despicable AP/AOL stories (from anonymous sources) that said the Blackwater has "hindered" the investigation iinto those media hyped shootings by repairing and repainting its vehicles so fast (I really can't make this stuff up):

The media/leftist LYNCHING of Blackwater has FAILED? You can just see the frustration and calculation behind this propaganda story. Beinbg telepathic, I can tell you the media thinking here:

"What can we do here? Democrats don't want to be NAMED anymore--it makes them seem like what they are--mere tools of the far left and public relations agents for the terrorists. Iraq no longer cares (they are actually trying to make a better life for themselves, with the success of the surge). But all is not lost. We can fall back on our EVIL hole card: ANONYMOUS SOURCES striking from the shadows (who cares whether they really exist, or know what they are talking about). WE have an agenda. The "SOURCES" have an agenda. But we KNOW how absolutely stupid the public is. They will keep buying this stuff, no matter how often anonymous sources are discredited. Let the LYNCHING go forward!!!"

More mental eavesdropping on AP/AOL personnel:

"Hey, that guy, skip3366 is jumping on us again about anonymous sources, and lynching Blackwater.   He will probably start saying things shortly about the U.S. Constitution giving people the right to confront the witnesses against them, because it is UNFAIR to let people be attacked from the shadows,  by people behind a mask."

"Ah, forget it.   Nobody reads that stupid AOL blog of his, "The Maverick Conservatives".  Doesn't he know that is McCAIN?  That time we ran 18 stories trying to lynch Blackwater, in 14 days, he quoted almost ALL of them--nobody cared.(Why do you let him have that stupid blog, anyway?)"

"We worry about the flak if we squash the stupid thing.  This "anonymous source" crusade of his is beginning to worry me, though.  It is not even just politics.  He has attacked FALSE stories on Albert Puljous, the San Francisco Zoo incident, and he has even defended DREW PETERSON from rumor and gossip.  The guy just does not understand that a free press has to be allowed to GET people, and SPECULATE, in order to compete in this internet world hooked on rumor and gossip."

Continuing my mental eavesdropping on AP and AOL personnel:

That guy, skip3366, just does not understand that the modren media can't wait for FACTS--especially if we want to advance our agenda and keep and audience.  The public doesn't care if back fence gossip is useless and EVIL.  They are just stupid boobs wanting hysterical hype so that they don't have to think too hard.  That is why we can advance our agenda with this ridiculous rumor, hearsay, and gossip--where we HIDE the real "news" of WHO is saying this stuff."

"I know, but I worrly a little bit about whether anybody is going to buy that RUMORS about 'repairing and repainting' trucks really constitutes 'obstruction of justice'.  Do you think people will really buy that a company has to leave their equipment in sad shape just to satisfy the media and endless 'investigators'?"

"Oh, people will buy ANYTHING, so long as we tell them often enough and they never start reading "The Maverick Consrvative."

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this