Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

The Maverick Conservative

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< Barack Obama: &nb
Friday, May 23, 2008
Barack Obama In t >
Saturday, May 24, 2008
May 2008
Nancy Pelosi and the Mainstream Media:  WINNERS, Flying, Fickle Finger of Fate
Iraq:  Propaganda Contnues (from the Manistream Media--NOT the Bush Administration)
Hillary Clinton, Democracy, Superdelegates, and the Rules
Women:  Should They Have the Vote?
John McCain:  Obscene Profits Or Just Obscene?
Ted Kennedy:  Associated Press Love Affair Continues
Farm Bill:  We Don't Need No Sinkin' Free Market
Opera:  A Dull Art Form--An Inconvenient Truth
Scott McClellan
Gasoline:  Further Lessons in Free Market Theory--The O'Reily Factor
Gasoline and Oil Prices:  Can Do Approach
Veterans, Leftists, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Barack Obama:  Gaffe Central
OPEC and the Oil Market
Barack Obama, Messiah Raising the Dead:  Does Barack Obama Know the Meaning of Memorial D
Oil and Gasoline Prices:  Free Market Theory
Free Market Theory
Oil:  Profits and Profit Margins
Mexico: A Failed Country
Anti-American AP and AOL:  WINNERS, Flying Fickle Finter of Fate
Barack Obama In the Crosshairs
Hillary Clinton:  Media Assassination?
Barack Obama:  Do Leftists WANT Him Killed?
Hillary Clinton:  Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy and Media Misrepresentation
Endorsements and Candidates
Smiley Faces, Urban/Non-Urban Legends, Serial Killers, and Crop Circles
John McCain:  Reaching Across the Aisle
Oil Companies and Gasoline:  This Blog vs. Michelle Malkin
McCain's Vice President
Democrats and the Farm Bill:  Lessons Unlearned, or Never Learned
John McCain and Hilary Clinton:  Running Mates?
Fat People and the Blind:  "Victim" Society Spirals Out of Control
Drew Peterson:  Deja Vu All Over Again
John McCain and Homosexuality
Fox News:  Part of the Problem and NOT Part of the Solution
President Bush and Oil
President Bush, Oil, Farmers, and Tunnel Vision
John Dean, Scumbag.  What about Keith Olbermann?
Iraq:  AOL and AP Anti-American Propaganda Continues
PETA and Horse Racing
Amusement Parks and Federal Regulation:  A Fantasy "Solution" To That "Problem", and All Proble
Democrats and Superdelegates:  Media Gets It WRONG
McCain:  Can He Win TEXAS--Not to Mention Tennessee?
Air Travel in the 21st Century
Mike Huckabee, Vice President
Iraq:  AOL and the AP in Anti-American Propaganda Mode
Global Warming Fraud:  Another Straw in the Wind
Barack Obama:  Does CNN Want Him Killed?
North Korea,  Harry Truman, and the Anti-American AP (Promoted by the anti-American AOL
University of Toledo:  WINNER, Flying, Fickle Finger of Fate
Barack Obama: Liar
Strategic Oil Reserve and Bureaucratic Inertia
Democrats:  Immune From Criticism, Even by IMPLICATION?
Kyla:  Congratulations
Zimbabwe
Michelle Obama:  Growing Up Hating America?
Obama To Women:  "You Sweeties"
Iraq and John McCain:  Leftists Lie
McCain and Nixon
Leftists Don't Believe in Democracy
Rush Limbaugh and Me
Conservatism in the Wilderness
Keith Olbermann:  America, Land of Cold Blooded Killers
Israel and the U.S.:  No Bond? Or Is It Just the Despicable AP Again"
Purple Hearts:  The Acapolypse Is Upon Us
Obama and the Media:  In the Tank for Obama
Anderson Cooper:  Complete and Total Fool
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama:  "Expected" 40(plus)% Loss
Leftist Insult Boomerangs
Pat Tillman
Sodom and Gomorrah
Baracl Pbama:  McCain's Best Friend
Free Speech and Homosexuality:  Leftists Do NOT Believe in Free Speech
Hillary Clinton Wins West Virginis:  Excllusive Projection
Gasoline, Oil, and Crocodile Tears
Autism and Kooks
Leftist Loons and Education
Leftists:  Education a Bad Thing?
Drew Peterson, Redux
Admirals and Commanders-in-Chief:  Double Standard
Propaganda and the Associated Press
John McCain:  Flying, Fickle Finger of Fate WINNER
Martin Luthor King, Jr.  Reverend Wright and the Vietnam War Memorial
Blackwater:  Blog Proven Right Again
Transgender:  Sodom and Gomorrah Revisited--Experimenting On Our Children
Stephen King and John Kerry:  Troops Can't Read
Tax Returns and Sanctimonious Hypocrites
AOL:  Anti-Military Propaganda (I Repeat:  You Should Leave AOL)
Conservatives Are Happier
Carbon Dioxide:  Pollutant?
Barack Obama:  Victory?
Global Warming Propaganda Gets More Ridiculous
U.S. Contractors and Tax Dodges
Hillary Clinton:  Media/Obama/DNC Try To Force Her OUT
Myanmar:  "Bodies Floating Through Flooded Myanmar
Death Penalty:  How We Got Here
Death Penalty: Leftist Thinking--The End Justifies the Means
Death Penalty:  Subverting Democracy
Barack Obama:  The Black Candidate or the Far Left Candidate?
Myanmar/Burma Death Tolls and the Media
Green Energy
Flu Pandemic or Sexually Transmitted Disease Pandemic:  Which Is More Likely?
Roger Clemens:  Sex Remains Hazardous To Your Health
Death Tolls and the Disgraceful "News" Media
Hillary Clinton "Obliterates" Iran
World Hunger:  Environmentalist Crimes Against Humanity Become Clearer
Montel Williams and Charles Schumer:  WINNERS, Flying, Fickle Finger of Fate
Serial Killers and Kooks:  You Are a Kook If: Series Returnss
Gas Prices, Obama, and Leftist Elitism
Leftist Depression:  When Does It Become More Dangerous to Them Than To the Rest of Us?
Ecoonmy and Leftist Democrats:  D.C. Madam Depression Deepens
Economy, Continued
Consumer Confidence:  How to Ruin the Economy in One Easy Lesson
Economy:  More Leftist Thinking Revealed
Economy:  Leftist Thinking Revealed
Economy and Good News:  Is This a D.C. Madam Moment for Leftists
Global Warming:  The Scam Confirmed
John McCain, Pinhead
Chuck Schumer:  Partisan Political Hack, part II
Chuck Schumer:  Partisan Polical Hack
« May 2008 Archive
Saturday, May 24, 2008
1:25:00 AM EDT

Hillary Clinton:  Media Assassination?


This is a continuation of my attempt to show how the media is DISTORTING the reference by Hillary Clinton to the assassiantion of Robert F. Kennedy.  See the previous two entries--although the second one has to do with the leftist psyche, and how they seem to WANT barack Obama to suffer the martyrdom of previous Messiah, Jesus Christ.  The quotes below are from the despicable AP, although some leftists are going even furtehr overboard:

"Responding to a question from the Sioux Falls Argus Leader editorial board about calls for her to drop out of the race, she said: "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. You know I just, I don't understand it," she said, dismissing the idea of abandoning the race.

Clinton said she didn't understand why, given this history, some Democrats were calling for her to quit."

The second paragraph above, AND the false lead paragraph in the entire story (analyzed in my first entry), are NOT TRUE.  I saw the clip of the einterview question and answer.   Clinton's point was that there was NO REASON for her to get out.  She was NOT "citing" "given this history" as a REASON for staying in the race (as earlier part of answer, NOT quoted, makes clear).   She was merely expressing her puzzlement at this bizarre MODERN compulsion to try to force people to drop out of political races, when that was not true in the past--not true that people were FORCED out early.  RFK (see the tape) merely came into Clinton's head--she was stuttering over thinking of furthe examples) as an example of a race still going on, with major developments, in June.

Let me see.  Can I make this clearer?  Clinton started off her answer to this question by expressing amazement and frustration that so many people were demanding she get out of the race BEFORE IT IS OVER (as it cannot be before the convention, although she did not say that, since the superdelegates do not vote until then).  Clinton's ONLY "reason" for "not getting out" was that the race is NOT OVER.  The comments abut the past, including about RFK, were clearly indtended as CRITICISM of people who don' seem to understand that history shows you do not get out of a race until it is OVER.  That was the meaning of her last sentence:  "I don't  understand it".  That immediately followed the RFK reference, but clearly had nouthing to do with it (as the reference clearly had nothing to do with Clinton's main point).  Clinton was talking about "not understanding" why some politicians and media people seemed to think that they had a right to demand that she "get out" before the race is over.

That brings up a major point.  Have you noticed that the media--ALL of them--start questioining whether a candidate should drop out the moment the candidate loses a primary (early on), or seeems to face an uphill battle.  Clinton is RIGHT (just can't believe I am saying these things).  This is an EVIL thing.  the media should be reporting FACTS, and not lobbying for candidates to get out of the race--encouraging others to try to FORCE candidates out by media "reports" whch have the effect of cutting off a candidate's money.  

This is a subset of the overall media problem, which is getting worse by the day.  SPECULATON is NOT "news". 



Written by skip3366 Blog about this entry
This entry has 6 comments: (Add your own)
  • #6 Comment from skip3366Entry Author 
    5/25/08 7:19 PM Permalink
    The main problems over the first 200 yeas had NOTHING to do with us being a "theocracy".  Did "religious freedom" suffer because of prayer in loccal schools?  Not that I noticed, and I grew up taking "Bible classes" on school property (after hours) in Mt. Ida, Arkansas.  Women suffragettes and activists were often very religous (seeing what "demon rum" did to men).  ANTI-SLAVERY activists were extremely religious  You might objectively conclude that RELIGION was the downfall of slaery, and one of the main forces behind the Civil War.  Uniton Troops went into battle TO END SLAVEARY singing:  "Mine eyes have seen the coming og the glory of the Lord.."  I would, and have, argued that leftists have DESTROYED the black family, while undermining marriage with such crusades as the crusade for homosexual "marriage".  This has done more damage to African-Americans than anything that has happened since the modern civil rights movement began to prevail with Brown v. Board of Education.  Then there is the MASSIVE control the Federal Government now has over our lives.  Leftists have a very selective view of "freedom", and a very strange idea of what a "theocracy" is (lwhere they should look at almost ANY country where Islam is the main religion).
  • #5 Comment from blondepennie02 
    5/25/08 2:13 PM Permalink
    OK ...let's go back 200 years ... freedom prevailed awright ...as long as you were white, male and a property owner.    And, boy ... those ALIEN AND SEDITION ACTS were a breath of fresh air.
  • #4 Comment from skip3366Entry Author 
    5/24/08 8:13 PM Permalink
    I emphatically do NOT agree about the "religious right" (even though I am an agnottic myself).  As I have repeatedly illustrated in this blog, the LEFT (includnig the ACLU) is MORE INTOLERANT than the "religious right" ever thought of being--or ever had any chance of being), including intolerant of the "religious right".

    Let us go back to the first 200 years of this country's history (history is something leftists ignore, except to distort it).  Did this country have no "liberty" during that time?  Yet, for almost ALL of that time, abortion was illegal (which I think has to do with INFANTICIDE rather than reiligion)  Homosexuality was NOT APPROVED (although generally tolerated).  In fact, it was regareded as a DISEASE until well into the 20th Century.  For THOUSANDS of years of human history (all of it), marriage has been regarded as between a man and a woman.  There was no question of EXCLUDING prayer in local schools until 1960.  This idea that the "religious right" is trying to undermine our founding " values" by imposing a "theocracy"  is another one of those leftist Big Lies.
  • #3 Comment from blondepennie02 
    5/24/08 7:39 PM Permalink
    The Religious Right’s ‘jihads’ against individual liberty are every bit as destructive to freedom as the Left’s various social engineering, soak-the-rich schemes.
    I’d prefer McCain or Obama over a palpably evil and duplicitous Clinton.
  • #2 Comment from skip3366Entry Author 
    5/24/08 7:19 PM Permalink
    Actually, Hillary Clinton's comment was NOT about Barack Obama (see the tape), and was, at worst, a politically insensitive remark resulting from Clinton "searching" for an example.   I would not "get on" Barack Obama for that kind of remark.  "Political Correctness" in speech is not onw of my things.  I "got on" (correctly) Hillary Clinton for her lie about being under "sniper fire" in Bosnia (Dan thought I was too hard on her, but I was not).  It is the MEDIA that is shwoing BIAS here--being willing to =jump all over Clinton over nothing while excusing everything Obama says (much worse)--not ME.

    Blondepennie, however,is almost like Dick Morris in her views on Hillary Clinton.  She acsused me of "sleeping with" Hillary Clinton (I am sure she meant figuratively)  The mere thoght gave me nightmares for weeks.  Yes, I am assuming blondepennie is a woman.  That is not only because of the screen name, but because it is almost always WOMEN who are capble of giving me nightmares that bad.  As readers of ths blog know, I favor Hillary Clinton for President ONLY to SABOTAGE both the Democratic Party and feminism for the next hundred years--hardly making me a real fan of hers.
Show all comments (1 more)