Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Hold the 'Fone

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< 'Scoundrels' and
Tuesday, August 8, 2006
The Five Coolest  >
Friday, August 11, 2006
August 2006
Wednesday, August 9, 2006
Subject: A Whole New 'World'
Time: 6:42:00 PM EDT
Author:  summermovieblog


Nicolas Cage in World Trade Center

With Oliver Stone's Sept.11 film 'World Trade Center' opening today, the three big questions on everyone's mind are: 1) Is it any good? 2) Does it do justice to the people and events of that fateful day? 3) Is America ready to pony up money to watch a film about a tragedy that occured just five short years ago?

Now, question 3 is a toughie, and one that the American public will answer collectively at the box office this weekend. But I've seen the film and can answer questions 1 and 2 quite easily right now. 'World Trade Center' is indeed good, although not great, and it most definitely honors America, democracy, the importance family and the heroism of those who lived and died on 9/11. With 'United 93,' the only other feature film to date to tackle the events of Sept. 11, director Paul Greengrass put viewers right in the middle of the hijacking of the eponymous flight as it was unfolding in real time. The result was a film that was deeply unsettling and powerful, even though it maintained an objective distance from its characters. We never really got to know the individuals on the flight -- their back stories and even their names -- and yet we still cared for them, still felt as though we knew them. And that's because Greengrass' film made us feel as though we were one of them. I thought the film was amazing, but -- that said -- I don't think I'd ever want to go through the experience of watching it again.

'World Trade Center' is a completely different beast. In contrast to 'United 93,' it relies completely on character development. Rather than provide an objective bird's-eye view of the day's harrowing events, the film focuses on what befell John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) and Will Jimeno (Michael Pena), two Port Authority police officers -- and courageous first responders to the scene -- who found themselves pinned under layers of rubble after the first tower collapsed. The entire film revolves around these men and the impact their situation has on their families. Much of the movie is simply Cage and Pena -- faces caked in ash, blood and dirt, filling the whole frame -- talking to each other because that's the only thing keeping them alive. And in their dialogue, their unwillingness to give up, they reveal themselves to each other and the audience in ways both inspiring and gut-wrenching.

Equally raw and moving are the performances of Maria Bello (as McLoughlin's wife Donna) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (as Pena's pregnant wife Allison), both of whom grapple with what the loss of her husband would mean for the family. I won't ruin it, but the movie's best, most powerful moments involve Bello and Gyllenhaal coming to grips with the fact that life will never be the same.

The only thing that keeps 'World Trade Center' from being a truly great film is that it feels like a movie about Sept. 11. It has the rousing score, the big Hollywood star (Cage), some pretty cheesy moments and the happy ending, so that we never really let ourselves get too affected by what's happening on screen. But -- you know what? -- I'm not so sure that's a bad thing at this point in time.

Plus, the film does have one other great thing going for it: Controversy magnet and conspiracy theory aficionado Oliver Stone portrays this tale of heroism and hope in as straightforward and apolitical a way as he's ever told a story. In fact, if it didn't say in the credits that this is an Oliver Stone film, I don't think anyone would even believe that 'World Trade Center' was made by the same guy who gave us 'Natural Born Killers' and 'JFK.' Instead of putting his own spin on this tale, Stone defers to McLoughlin and Jimeno, whose accounts provided the basis for the movie. As a result, Stone has produced a heartfelt, moving, deeply patriotic film that honors all those who fought, died and -- in this case -- lived on 9/11. This is one happy ending no one should take for granted.

POST: Too soon for this film?

See gallery of Oliver Stone's 11 most controversial films

Get 'World Trade Center' showtimes & tickets

Tags: World Trade Center, Oliver Stone, Nicolas Cage, Summer Movies

Written by summermovieblog Blog about this entry
This entry has 76 comments: (Add your own)
  • #76 Comment from sapphire038 
    8/17/06 5:32 PM Permalink
    Yes its to soon .I don't think the movie should have ever been made out of respect for all that was involvedand the ones that are still affected.Its very sad that some one would do this ,But since it has been made I think the money should be donated to all the family members and to help fund the ground zero memoral.and anything purtaining to the diaster.


                             Vicky G.
  • #75 Comment from dysphoriavii 
    8/17/06 4:49 PM Permalink
    Definitely not.  After five years, I think it's important not to forget the details of that day.  The families of those directly affected won't, and neither should we.  I saw World Trade Center, and thought it was a very straight-forward, moving film that tugged at your heart just enough to draw some tears, but not enough to make you wish you'd brought the entire box of kleenex.
  • #74 Comment from rockygems7 
    8/14/06 2:16 PM Permalink
    I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK IT WAS TOO SOON, IT'S JUST WE WERE SO BOMBADED BY THE BLOODY MEDIA ABOUT THIS TRAIC,EVENT UNTIL WE WERE PRACTICALLY BRAINWASHED BY THE CONSTANT IMAGES OF THE PLANES FLYING INTO THE TOWERS IN NYC. I SAT AND HAD TO HAVE TOO MANY DRINKS I COULD'T FATHOM WHAT WAS HAPPENING, THEN WENT HOME AND CRIED FOR HOURS. (I'M NOT KNOW TO BE A CRYER). SO THEREFORE, IF I'M GOING TO SPEND MY HARD EARNDED DOLLARS AT A OVER PRICED THEATER, I WANT TO BE ENTERTAINED, NOT CRY MY EYES OUT. WE'RE STILL BOMBADED W/ WHAT'S GOING ON IN IRAQ AND AFGANISTAN. THIS WAS JUST A BAD IDEA ALL THE WAY AROUND.THE"SUITS"DIDN'T SEE THIS ONE COMING. BUT THEN AGAIN, THEY MAKE MANY STUPID MISTAKES. THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE AMERICAN AUDIENCE. THE CRITICS ARE STUPID. THEY RAVE ABOUT SLOP, THEN YOU HAVE POTC2 COME OUT W/ MIXED REVIEWS, VERY POOR REVIEWS FROM "VARIETY", AND "THE EVER TAKING POT-SHOTS AT JOHNNY DEPP, "ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY"GIVING IT VERY POOR REVIEWS. I QUESS CAPTAIN SPARROW AND CREW SHOWED THEM!!!! THAT MOVIE SAVED THE YEAR'S BOX-OFFICE, SOMEONE IN HOLLYWOOD OUGHT TO BE KISSSING THEIR BOTTOM-ENDS. NOW THEIR ONLY SHOWING IT 4 TIMES A DAY! LAST WEEK THEY WERE SHOWING IT 12 TIMES A DAY. NO WONDER IT'S DOWN AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LIST. HOW CAN A MOVIE MAKE MONEY WHEN IT'S ONLY ON MAYBE 2000 THEATERS, 4 TIMES A DAY? THAT'S HOLLYWIERD FOLKS! BY THE WAY MOVIEFONE I SAW POTC2, 4 TIMES THIS SUMMER. TELL YOU FOLKS IN HOLLYWOOD ANYTHING?I WON'T SPEND MY MONEY ON SOMEONE'S MESSSAGE, RACISM, OR WAR!!WE CAN SEE THATALL THE TIME. WHY SPEND $20.00 AT MOVIES, WHAT WE CAN SEE ON TV EVERYNIGHT? SORRY OLIVER AND NICOLAS CAGE (GOOD ACTOR). THIS WAS JUST NOT A GOOD IDEA ALL THE WAY AROUND? I WONDER HOW THE HECK IT GOT FINANCED?
  • #73 Comment from lveopenspaces 
    8/14/06 12:55 PM Permalink
    This story is best presented as a documentary with facts and figures; not as a director's platform for expressing his view of the world. It is an insult to the people who died.
  • #72 Comment from catface91 
    8/14/06 12:42 PM Permalink
    Get over it you bunch of SISSIES.  History is never to SOON to be told.  You Bush suporting WAR MONGERS use Sept. 11 to justify every breech of Bush's Adminstration's callous actions.  You wrap yourselves around the flag every chance you get screaming "God Bless America"  and talking tough, but making a movie about the very SYMBOL to your "battle cries" and bitching about it shows how full of S$*T you truly are!

    Memo to Hollywood Keep making 9/11 films PLEASE!
Show all comments (71 more)