Ads are not an endorsement by the blog author.

Lost in my own thoughts

Public Journal
 Back to Journal Archives | Subscribe to Alerts Alerts Subscribe to Alerts | Feeds
< ABC photo challen
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
karens monday pho >
Sunday, April 20, 2008
April 2008
Sunday, April 20, 2008

energy saver light bulbs

Surprised



I bought some of these and my husband freaked out. He said he had heard they were not good for you,So I went online (thinking he was crazy) and investigated and this is what I found.
 
An energy saving bulb has gone - evacuate the room now!By MARTIN DELGADO - More by this author » Last updated at 01:27am on 6th January 2008

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=506347&in_page_id=1965#StartComments Comments (53)

fluorescent bulb

Danger: The new eco-friendly bulbs contain toxic mercury (picture posed by model)

Energy-saving light bulbs are so dangerous that everyone must leave the room for at least 15 minutes if one falls to the floor and breaks, a Government department warned yesterday.

The startling alert came as health experts also warned that toxic mercury inside the bulbs can aggravate a range of problems including migraines and dizziness.

And a leading dermatologist said tens of thousands of people with skin complaints will find it hard to tolerate being near the bulbs as they cause conditions such as eczema to flare up.

The Department for Environment warned shards of glass from broken bulbs should not be vacuumed up but instead swept away by someone wearing rubber gloves to protect them from the bulb's mercury content.

In addition, it said care should be taken not to inhale any dust and the broken pieces should be put in a sealed plastic bag for disposal at a council dump – not a normal household bin.

None of this advice, however, is printed on the packaging the new-style bulbs are sold in. There are also worries over how the bulbs will be disposed of.

Scroll down for more

Under new regulations for hazardous waste, councils are obliged to recycle them.

At present, they should be placed in special bins also used for batteries at a council dump. But in future, councils will have to provide a collection service or install special recycling banks for the bulbs.

There are fears that without a proper disposal system, the mercury content could contaminate water supplies.

But disposing of one municipal recycling bin full of bulbs costs about £650 each time, adding to fears of higher council tax bills.

The warnings cast a shadow over Government plans to begin phasing out traditional tungsten lights this month.

Ministers hope that using the more environmentally friendly bulbs will save at least five million tons of carbon dioxide emissions every year.

The bulbs are due to become compulsory in homes in four years. Campaigners are calling for an opt-out so that people with health problems can still use old-style bulbs.

Others are thinking of hoarding the familiar pear-shaped bulbs so that they can keep on using them even after they have disappeared from the shops.

Independent environmental scientist Dr David Spurgeon warned yesterday: "Because these light bulbs contain small amounts of mercury, they could cause a problem if disposed of in a normal bin.

"It is possible that the mercury could be released into the air or from land-fill when they are released into the wider environment. That is a concern, because mercury is a well-known toxic substance."

And dermatologist Dr John Hawk, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that some people already find it difficult to tolerate the fluorescent-strip lighting that is widely used in schools and offices, which works in the same way as the eco-friendly bulbs.

He said: "Fluorescent lights seem to have some sort of ionising characteristic where they affect the air around them.

"This does affect a certain number of people, probably tens of thousands, in Britain, whose ailments flare up just by being close to them.

"Certain forms of eczema – some of which are very common – do flare up badly anywhere near fluorescent lights, so these people have to just be around incandescent (old-style) lighting."



swmpgrly at 10:02:00 AM EDT Blog about this entry
This entry has 9 comments: (Add your own)
  • #9 Comment from lisadewane 
    5/3/08 1:14 PM Permalink
    Interesting.  I hadn't heard all this.  It's amazing sometimes how hard we try to do something good and end up worse off. :(
  • #8 Comment from browney44 
    5/3/08 10:57 AM Permalink
    OMG I've been tossing them in the trash.  My hubby buys them all the time at SAMS.
    I like natural light myself.  But be careful there too it cause skin cancer, can't win either way!!  LOL

    debbie
    http://journals.aol.com/browney44/debbiescrazymixeduplifestories/
  • #7 Comment from mavarin 
    4/22/08 3:07 AM Permalink
    Here is the Snopes page on this:
    http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/cfl.asp

    Short version: yes, there is a tiny amount of mercury, and you don't just throw the bulb away at the end of its extremely long life. But there's no hazard if you don't break the thing. Don't worry!
  • #6 Comment from rdautumnsage 
    4/21/08 5:02 PM Permalink
    Oh good grief, it doesn't seem as if you can win. You try to do something worthwhile for the environment and it turns out to be not only harmful to you, but the environment too in the long run. Thanks for this info. I'll have to pass this on to a few friends who do use these kind of bulbs. (Hugs) Indigo
    http://journals.aol.com/rdautumnsage/ravens-lament/
  • #5 Comment from jmoqueen 
    4/21/08 2:50 PM Permalink
    I'm using low energy bulbs but i didn't know half of this.  I heard that you had to dispose of them a different way to normal bulbs but that's my extent on the subject lol

    Jenny

    http://journals.aol.co.uk/Jmoqueen/MyLife
Show all comments (4 more)