The Feed - News That Doesn't Hurt

You know, the Mexican immigrants three generations ago are now national citizens of the United States: you would think they have the same citizenship rights just like my grandparents expected property rights and civil rights and citizenship rights upon being born American, and be American--they are not Mexican they are Americans and have the right to their nation.  The United States has seen several generations of immigrants and the past has had no social security, no welfare, no guaranteed schooling, no college entrance unless they had the wealth, and a lot of other no special rights while those who became citizens become United States American that is for America and no others.  With as much money the United States ends up spending on illegal immigration the United States has the right to tell Mexico what to do in its internal affairs, because they claim to have little control and are such poor poor people when they come to the United States (maybe a cultural reflection that Mexicans value themselves much less by willing to work for less than minimum wage for anything--value comes from within the individuals and within culture and they act like they have little value for life or each other), and even while next to a great nation that built itself and found its wealth through the labors of its United States citizens the nation of Mexico is unsatisfied with being the 14th wealthiest nation in the world.


The way they claim it is they have automatic rights despite United States law made by the former immigrants who found their own land by force of arms against England and King George III of England (the great United States of America has been in existence for over 200 years with its own law): to claim the illegal immigration cry of special rights to be true would be to empower the world against the United States and this is destruction.  The United States is number one.

Polls can be flaky.  If the Democrats are polling their best buddies for opinion, then it is a biased straw poll.  Professional polls are pollsters who have no bias about who is the best, and report using good and known statistical sampling methods.  Polling those entering the grounds of the Democratic National Committee is a good way to straw poll your own people, but it is not professional outside of the Democrat attitude (you only polled Democrats and not the whole spectrum of possibilities).  Poll sources must be openly reported to be credible and this includes methods.  Imagine the White House having Al Gore set up a action group for Al Gore and billing the White House (or graveyard), then you are experiencing political brinkmanship and a morphing with a public expectation that people actually support Al Gore as an independent action group (wait, Matt Drudge did this in front of the National Press Club).  The point, what are the poll sources?