help frankie

1) Obviously, you can finish what you started, continue to be a witness for the state and testify against me at trial. The results obviously for me, death, for you if your lawyer is any good you might be able to get the DA to let you go." (Here the defendant is telling her okay if you want to recant your statement and fight, I get it BUT you should understand this is an option you can consider, telling her to go ahead and sacrifice him to save herself! HE IS ACTUALLY GIVING HER PERMISSION TO DO SO!!!! He would then go and lay out other ways to trap the DA in his own pool of lies,. To expose he state for trying to set him up. The DA would read these statements to the jury claiming they are a confession, ignoring the fact that the very first option he laid out for her involved HIM DYING!) Now before we move onto the letters that the DA withheld from the defense and then used in kilters trial against her there is one more place to look. The trial of kistler and comments made by the DA. The reason I say that is because if you are paying attention to the content of the letters written by Kim, and the way she talked when she was on the stand you would think they were two completely different people. and I am not alone in that opinion, see the closing argument made by the DA, in Kims trial. Pg. 420, (by DA) " During her two and an hours days worth of testimony, I submit she looks as good as she ever will. This is one side of Kimberly Kistler. She wants you to take this side at face value. This side and this side along." ..." you read their correspondence. I mean this person that testified at trial and the person that comes out in the correspondence are one and the same person. But by looking at her, its hard to reconcile them."..." I think his words were trying to get out of her situation. How desperate was she? At what length would she go to hold onto him?" " .. Her testimony oat trial, as it relates to her culpability, does not agree with any of the other evidence in this case. Doesn’t even agree with her earlier statements.!" " Your honor I would suggest that a reasonable interpretation of this is, she hasn’t heard from frank all day. There are three people who know what happened there that night. One of them is dead. She is trying to find him. SHE IS AFRAID OF TALKING. That’s precisely what’s happening here." Now the letters that the commonwealth hid from the defendant and used against Kim in her trial are entered into evidence and labeled "K.K.#2, #3, #4, and #5. "These are the ones that have the most important information. They were all written to Kims sister, Kathy Gehr. Kim at this point knows well enough to tell her sister to destroy the letters that she sent to her since she does not want the DA to get a hold of them. Her sister turned them into the police anyway. The DA was smart enough to know to keep these letters away from the defense. They were never turned over. They never mentioned a word of them in the trial of the defendant. But when it came time to try Kim , they used these letters to the fullest extent. In "K.K. #2" Kim wrote the following,..". This is the man I knew and loved, he never laid a hand on me, (referring to the abusive boyfriends of the past) he treated me with kindness and respect. Anything I needed or wanted he gave without hesitation, and I mean ANYTHING! He sacrificed his own comfort to be with me when he got out of jail in July, he slept in his car at night and by day he was out looking for a job so he could get us a place to live". She also goes on to say..."(they told me), but now he’s trying to blame all this on me! (Referring to the murder) They would say none of these things in the trial of the defendant. Imagine that, portraying him as a "self sacrificing" type of person. The only man that never abused her. Telling the jury that Kim was told Harris was blaming HER for the murder! What would that have done for Kistler’ credibility? Apparently this was not lost on the DA since he kept it all from the defense. One of the most disturbing details, Kim describes the murder! If you read her testimony she was never anywhere close enough to Martin to see what he was wearing OR never anywhere to see the crime! But in her letters she describes the "slitting of his throat" and the " light blue shirt" he had on. How is this possible? She never testified to anything that would have given her access to that kind of information! It was not lost on the DA. They hid it from the defense AND listen to what they said about it in her trial. On page 104 of her transcripts, Det Savage says, "initially I thought it was a blue and white pinstripe shirt:"(he is describing how it looked that night, at the crime scene, in the dark, the same way the killer would have seen it) ... Q; Dark blue or light blue? A; "it would have been a medium blue pinstripe with a white shirt." Q; And what color did the shirt appear to be when it was put under the florescent lighting?" A; It was grey". So even the police that arrived at the crime scene said, in the lighting that night, it looked blue! On page 460 of her trial transcripts the DA agrees with me, "your honor how did she know? This letter was written...and we only got it. This letter was written before she ever delivered that baby. Before she was ever arraigned. Before there was any discovery. Before there was testimony from Dr. Ross about how slow this injury was. Det. Savage told you that in the dark, the shirt looked blue. How did she know?" the answer is simple. Only the killer would know this information. In "K.K. #5" She says.... "I don’t care anymore if frank lives or dies" this is not the impression she gave the jury in the defendants trial. She told them it was a very hard thing for her to do because she loved him! She also tells her sister she has a "great deal of contact with the DA’s office". In "K. K. #4" This one the date is readable on 3/19/97 she is telling her sister that her lawyer quit. She also tells her " I got to see the kids the day BEFORE I testified in court. ( remember in the trial for the defendant they said they only had a visit the day of the testimony.) They let me spend about an hour with them while I was GOING OVER THE TESTIMONY THEY WANTED ME TO GIVE THE NEXT DAY!". They repeatedly got her to deny that she was told what to say in the defendants trial. She also tells her sister, ... "They are seeking the death penalty for me, along with Frankie" a fact they would deny repeatedly in the defendants trail. Then in "K.K. #3" she tells her sister at this time she has a new lawyer. She also talks about her sister moving to north carolina. This is important because that sister never showed up to testify in the defendants trial and the police said they did not know where she was. YET there was a subpoena with her name and new address on it in the case file that would be found after the trial. In short the cops stood up in that courtroom and lied to the judge. Now there is one set of letters left to discuss. They are the letters Kim wrote to defendant AFTER he was on death row. In one dated 3/31/99, she talks about the Det. Named Geesey and the way he conducted himself during the investigation. " No I did not forget about the improper conduct, it was Geesey, and he said A LOT and did a lot that I did not think was too cool."..........."..Geesey is nothing but a crackerjack dick, and a dirty old man. I told you about the time he came into L.C.P. before I had legal counsel, and questioned me about our sex life...wanting details, had me crying my eyes out he’s a pervert, told me I had to tell him everything! Like if you ever fucked me in the ass, if we had sex with Gina or anyone else, what we did, if you fucked anyone else and had me watch.. Shit like that."......." the other half is how he gave me "special treatment"... at your preliminary. He had me outside the sheriffs area, in area where normal people wait..he would put an arm around me, hug me, talk shit. He’s the one who told me about the 10 years before I ever had Bri" in a letter written on September 25th 1998 she writes,...."... They were going to give me a plea of 3rd conspiracy with 2-15 and my lawyer said no, he told me I’d be walking out the courthouse with im after my trial.

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this