help frankie

They said the time period was only a few days, a week at the most! Yet those letters were dated over a three week period of time! Also they left that they also had the letters in their possession at that time that they hid from the defense, from Kim that backed up a few of the claims she and they were denying in the trial of the defendant! They had the balls to use those letters in the trial against Kim Kistler. The other part of their explanation to the jury on why they should ignore what Kim said in those letters? "She was trying to help him get out of jail by writing them"! That by itself is the most ridiculous thing you could imagine. So let me get this straight, a woman who had nothing to do with this, who is innocent and was used as an unwitting pawn, suddenly decides to do the right thing to do is to take all the blame off Harris and risk taking the fall herself????? That is utterly insane! But the jury BELIEVED IT!!! ask yourself this, if she was really trying to help him, why just call the police and tell them she did it? That was the quickest way to fix things? Or does it make more sense that Kim had an attack of conscience here! She felt bad about helping the state murder her childs father and for just a brief moment felt actual guilt!. That is what spurred the letters! Now she never put herself in harms way you will notice, but she did attempt to be honest about how they got her to say what she said! Now we move on to the trial testimony offered by Kim. On page 2959 on the transcripts the letters that she wrote first come up. Q; let me stop, who’s ott? A; OTT my ex boyfriend. Q; well according to the visitation list that I saw he was in to see you a number of time, is that correct? A; no. he WAS IN ONCE! (Remember her telling the defendant that it was a lie "they" were teeing him to turn against her? ). The record shows one visit on 1/31/96. The defendant has several letters that Kim wrote to Mr. Ott as well that he turned over to police. To say they are "friendly" is being nice. Shortly after that question there was this exchange, Q; it does not say that. A; well......Q; read what it does. A; I’d really rather not. Q; did you write the letter? A; Yes. Q; please read what it says,. A; Can I spell it ? At this point the DA complains to the judge and The judge rules in his favor Here is the reason for all this. In her letters she was EXTREMELY vulgar in her language. Problem is she is trying to present herself as a sweet innocent young woman who was duped into doing this. These things she wrote in the letter will not look like the image she is trying to portray, it does not go well with the performance she is giving, it would shock and offend the jury to actually hear these things come out the mouth of this innocent little girl! So her lawyer must have instructed her to refuse to read any kind of curse word! Now granted the jury is going to read the letters but the impact of hearing the words come from her mouth on the stand would have shattered the role she was playing. None the less the judge let her avoid saying them anyway! Q: the sentence that I’m---- quote, they showed me supposedly parts of your statement that you gave them that said you had sex with Gina our whole relationship, is it true. Question mark. My question is, who does the pronoun "they" refer to? A; referring to the DA’s office. Q; so you are saying here that somebody in the DA’s office showed you a part of Mr. Harris’s statement that he gave to them that said he had been having sex with Gina your whole relationship? A; they never showed me anything that said that. Q; they never did? A; No. They ...they said...they didn’t even come out and say that he definitely was. But it was tossed up in the air. Now the detective that actually told her that was Det. Brennemen, and it was told to her while she was being interviewed as a way of getting her to talk. Now if you were to look at the transcripts from Kim kilters trial you will see how it was "tossed up in the air" as she so casually put it. Pg. 219, By Det. Brennemen., A; I came in and introduced Myself to Ms. Kistler. And I said to her, I said Kim, im here because the investigators in this case, we feel that you have a right to know what kind of man your associated with her, meaning Mr. Harris. I first....I then advised ms. Kistler that during this investigation, we found out that frank was...Mr. Harris was quite the ladies’ man and he had been having sex with numerous other women. I also told her that myself and again Det. Ator, interviewed frank earlier in the day and it appeared that frank was proud of the fact that he had all these other women. I then advised ms. Kistler of a girl named Regina who was a sister of a girl named Chrissy. And Regina would have been a girl that Ms. Kistler and Frank had lived with a short time in Gap. Q; are you talking about Gina Ewing: A; yes. I then told Ms. Kistler that Frank advised myself and Ator that he was having sex with Regina duringthe entire time they had been staying with Chrissy in the trailer in ..I believe it was gap. Q; they meaning Kim and Frank were staying with Chrissy? A; Yes. (Now to clear up some things, one I already explained that Kim, Frank and Gina were involved in a three way relationship for awhile when they all lived in the same bedroom in Stevens, PA. No one ever denied that! Gina herself testified under oath that once she moved out the relationship ended! A fact the defendant has ALWAYS asserted! Also frank and Kim NEVER lived in a trailer with Chrissy. And ask yourself this, if the cops are questioning him about his whereabouts during a murder, what the hell would he be talking about his sex life for??? and most of all would he tell the cops he was cheating on his girlfriend knowing they also want to talk to her? It defies all sense! ) He goes on... A; I think I advised Kim about a girl named Mary Kay who was a customer at the pipeline bar where frank worked. I advised her that frank...we found out frank was having sex with her. I also advised her of two other girls that frequented the Pipeline bar, Tina and Luann, and told her that these two girls were also having sex with frank. I then told Kim that we spoke to a good friend of frank’s, Mr. Harris, that told us of numerous women that he was having sex with who lived in new jersey. (Once again things must be explained. The girl "Mary Kay" is named Sherry henry, she actually testified in the trial!

|  Add to del.icio.us |  digg this